C
Cat
Guest
So for those of you who are critical of the book’s proposals, what is your strategy for parishes that are consistently losing members in large numbers, or who are, tragically, closing due to lack of members? Concrete action plan, please. Thank you.
I’ll be honest, I think that in emergencies and crises, we need to do whatever is necessary, short of committing sin, to get things done. When people are going to hell, we can’t just sit back and wait it out. We have to get moving. If you have a different approach than the book, then what is your approach?
James 5:19-20 makes it clear that we must work to rescue those who have fallen away from the faith. And the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20) makes it clear that we are to evangelize non-believers. Pope Benedict XVI pushed “the new evangelization,” and encouraged discussion about the way to actually do evangelization. And Pope Francis continues to challenge Catholics and parishes to not be afraid to work hard to help the poor and the marginalized.
As an ex-Evangelical Protestant (47 years, and then converted to Catholicism in 2004), I would say that parishes need to consult with their ex-Evangelical members about the strategies in the book. Many of us have lived through various strategies for growing big churches, and many of us have been disillusioned by some of these strategies. But other strategies have resulted in true conversions and life-long disciples. I think that some of the “needs-based” methods have some flaws, and Catholic parishes need to either fix the flaws or avoid those methods.
OTOH, I see absolutely nothing wrong with a parish improving the quality of the Mass music, or making sure that all people are welcomed at the door of the parish by a friendly person who has the ability to make others feel comfortable (spiritual gift of hospitality), or providing adequate worship aids for those who are new to the parish or new to Catholicism.
I’ll be honest, I think that in emergencies and crises, we need to do whatever is necessary, short of committing sin, to get things done. When people are going to hell, we can’t just sit back and wait it out. We have to get moving. If you have a different approach than the book, then what is your approach?
James 5:19-20 makes it clear that we must work to rescue those who have fallen away from the faith. And the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20) makes it clear that we are to evangelize non-believers. Pope Benedict XVI pushed “the new evangelization,” and encouraged discussion about the way to actually do evangelization. And Pope Francis continues to challenge Catholics and parishes to not be afraid to work hard to help the poor and the marginalized.
As an ex-Evangelical Protestant (47 years, and then converted to Catholicism in 2004), I would say that parishes need to consult with their ex-Evangelical members about the strategies in the book. Many of us have lived through various strategies for growing big churches, and many of us have been disillusioned by some of these strategies. But other strategies have resulted in true conversions and life-long disciples. I think that some of the “needs-based” methods have some flaws, and Catholic parishes need to either fix the flaws or avoid those methods.
OTOH, I see absolutely nothing wrong with a parish improving the quality of the Mass music, or making sure that all people are welcomed at the door of the parish by a friendly person who has the ability to make others feel comfortable (spiritual gift of hospitality), or providing adequate worship aids for those who are new to the parish or new to Catholicism.