L
LJH_80
Guest
Every post on either side has agreed on one thing:
There is not enough information in the article to make any kind of informed statement.
Thus, may I suggest that those who want this case to be discussed attempt to find actual medical information about the case, and present it for debate. Otherwise, all this thread is going to be is,
“well it could have been this…”
“true, but it could also have been this…”
And that seems like a waste of time to me.
There is not enough information in the article to make any kind of informed statement.
Thus, may I suggest that those who want this case to be discussed attempt to find actual medical information about the case, and present it for debate. Otherwise, all this thread is going to be is,
“well it could have been this…”
“true, but it could also have been this…”
And that seems like a waste of time to me.