My sister-in-law tried this one, but not on her brother- on me. Her logic (convoluted of course): If I had not married her brother, she and her children would have been his beneficiaries should he have died. Therefore, because I had “stolen” her insurance money and other benefits of my husband’s employment, we were obligated to get her various physical objects (a computer so she didn’t have to use the one at the junior college or library, her daughter’s graduation dress from middle school, money for an alleged business, money for illegal usage, etc.) or give her money. As I am the one who issues the family finances, she claimed I could just more or less write her a check every so often.
Not only does this wish her brother, my husband, dead, it expects collection prior to his demise. Because she was into the “godess” movement, or because she had not thought of it, I am sure she would have quoted scripture to try to guilt me into it. I’m not budging. She doesn’t get to wish my sweetheart dead and collect the payment before he goes.
We did try to help her kids, when she had custody of them. We made sure this was done in such a way that the s-i-l could not possibly benefit form it.