Pelosi Misleads Health Care Summit, Says Bill Has No Abortion Funding

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

juliee

Guest
Washington, DC – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi mislead participants at the White House health care summit today by making the false statement that the Senate health care bill she, President Barack Obama and Democrats are pushing through Congress contains no abortion funding.

lifenews.com/nat6050.html
 
Pray for poor misguided Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden & all the other “catholics” who bring scandal on the Church.

Nancy is just another sad victim of ignorance, arrogance & the abuse of power.

Why don’t these people just tell the truth,** “i need the money from the people who profit from murdering innocent babies (the Planned Parenthood, Pro-Abortion crowd) so i will use your hard earned tax $$$$ to murder innocent babies!”**

These sad politicians all tend to deny the Truth & bend it with slick verbage to suit their needs.

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora Pro Nobis Peccatoribus!

mark
 
Pelosi is a cafeteria Catholic. She has been corrected numerous times on this issue and yet she continues to support abortion. This makes her a cafeteria Catholic and a heretic. I wish someone would just excommunicate her so that maybe her soul has some chance of repenting and reaching Heaven.
 
Washington, DC – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi mislead participants at the White House health care summit today by making the false statement that the Senate health care bill she, President Barack Obama and Democrats are pushing through Congress contains no abortion funding.

lifenews.com/nat6050.html
Over $300 MILLION dollars is given to Planned Parenthood each year from the federal government. Our tax money is being used to fund abortion whether or not we agree.
 
Pelosi is a cafeteria Catholic. She has been corrected numerous times on this issue and yet she continues to support abortion. This makes her a cafeteria Catholic and a heretic. I wish someone would just excommunicate her so that maybe her soul has some chance of repenting and reaching Heaven.
Maybe the church dosen’t want to go there?
 
**

Why don’t these people just tell the truth,** “i need the money from the people who profit from murdering innocent babies (the Planned Parenthood, Pro-Abortion crowd) so i will use your hard earned tax $$$$ to murder innocent babies!”****

These sad politicians all tend to deny the Truth & bend it with slick verbage to suit their needs.

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora Pro Nobis Peccatoribus!

mark

Some people say that there is no truth with a capital “T”? Is it true that there is no truth? If you believe that statement, then you are between the devil and the deep blue sea. It is what St. Thomas Aquinas would call a self-contradiction (“contradiction in actu exercito”).

As I have said in other threads, truth is immutable. It does not change through the ages. Truth does not have legs on it. It does not move around with the changing of the times. Truth cannot be denied.

“It seems to me that one must bring men back…to the hope of finding the truth (St. Thomas Aquinas).” Sixteen centuries later we are at a similar crossroads.

I will go back to my argument that the moon is made of cheese, if you believe it is made of cheese. I was making fun of relativism. The relativist would have us believe that each of us has our own version of truth. Many of you have pointed this out to me in numerous threads. Relativism is another “ism” that is self-contradictory and untenable.

At first blush relativism seems broadminded. Let’s agree to disagree. However, if truth is universal, immutable, objective and inescapable, then we can’t agree to disagree, can we?

Relativism is intolerant. It is intolerant of truth. Relativism says that truth is not universal, immutable, objective and inescapable.

Either truth is true for all people for all ages, or it is false. The relativist does not fall into the trap of the skeptic by saying that truth does not exist. The relativist does not deny the existence of truth. The relativist falls into the trap of believing that truth is relative.

Here is the rub: The relativist believes that his opinion is correct. Is everyone else wrong who believes that truth is universal, immutable, objective and inescapable? Using the classical definition of truth, truth must be unconditionally true and it must be true for everyone. There is a self-contradiction here. The relativist is saying that it is unconditionally true that truth is relative!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top