Perspectives; Father Raymond Brown

  • Thread starter Thread starter CelticWarlord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CelticWarlord

Guest
Raymond Edward Brown (1928 – 1998) was an American Catholic priest, a member of the Sulpician Fathers and a prominent biblical scholar. He was regarded as a specialist concerning the hypothetical “Johannine community”, which he speculated contributed to the authorship of the Gospel of John, and he also wrote influential studies on the birth and death of Jesus. Brown was professor emeritus at Union Theological Seminary (UTS) in New York where he taught for 29 years. He was the first Catholic professor to gain tenure there, where he earned a reputation as a superior lecturer.
Code:
          -                -               -               -                -              -              -
“Instead of reading the Bible to assure ourselves that we are right,
we would be better to read it to discover where we have not been
listening."

"If we ever make Christian faith totally dependent on the latest scholarly interpretation of a text, it could change each week."

"…no matter how often we renew our faith, there is the supreme testing by death. Whether the death of a loved one or one’s own death, it is the moment where one realizes that all depends on God. We have been cautious during our life to shield ourselves with bank accounts, credit cards and investments, and to protect our future with health plans, life insurance, social security and retirement plans. Yet there comes a moment when neither cash nor ‘plastic’ works. No human support goes with one to the grave; and human companionship stops at the tomb. One enters alone."

"I find it necessary to be precise here because, on the American Catholic scene in the last two years, fundamentalist newspapers and journals have had a habit of trotting out a polemicist, dubbing him a scholar, and then playing a game of ‘scholars are divided’ in order to propose views that have no serious following in the world of biblical scholarship."

“Indeed by generous estimate, were scholars agreed on a portrait of the ‘historical Jesus,’ it would not cover one hundredth of the actual Jesus. It is equally a mistake to equate ‘the historical (reconstructed) Jesus’ with the real Jesus-- a Jesus who really means something to people, one on whom they can base their lives.”

“In preaching we must stress even for modern audiences that the Johannine Jesus is not engaged in cosmetic improvement of the quality of life on earth, offering more abundant water and food, with sharper vision and a longer span of years. From another world come his gifts, even if confusingly they bear the same names that our language gives to what we so eagerly seek on earth: food, light, and life. In reality, however, his gifts go beyond anything we could hope for, satisfying needs we scarcely knew we had and doing so permanently.”

“The readers/hearers of the Fourth Gospel are not meant simply to learn from such scenes: They must encounter Jesus too and be challenged by him; they will misunderstand by fitting him into their own preconceived needs, and they will have to be led to perceive God’s ways.”

-
 
“…no matter how often we renew our faith, there is the supreme testing by death. Whether the death of a loved one or one’s own death, it is the moment where one realizes that all depends on God. We have been cautious during our life to shield ourselves with bank accounts, credit cards and investments, and to protect our future with health plans, life insurance, social security and retirement plans. Yet there comes a moment when neither cash nor ‘plastic’ works. No human support goes with one to the grave; and human companionship stops at the tomb. One enters alone.”
Powerful and true.
 
"If we ever make Christian faith totally dependent on the latest scholarly interpretation of a text, it could change each week."
That right there is why I am not worried when the NYT tries to say that someone has “discovered” something about Jesus having a wife.
 
Maybe, maybe not. They are just quotes, we don’t know the context. ‘Fundamentalist’ here might mean faithful, orthodox Catholics of who he seemed to have a problem with.
 
Last edited:
faithful, orthodox Catholics of who he seemed to have a problem with.
Fr. Brown has no problem with any faithful Catholics. In fact, he had no problems with people for their faith at all, regardless of what it was (he didn’t teach at a Catholic institution).

Every now and then attempts to smear Fr. Brown appear on this website, and others. The posters claim that he wasn’t orthodox, or some other such nonsense. He was a Catholic priest in good standing his entire career. His books all carry the imprimatur, which should be sufficient for any Catholic to know that they are free from doctrinal error.

Pope Benedict XVI once said of him: “[we] would be very happy if we had many exegetes like Father Brown”

If that isn’t enough, he is held in the highest esteem by Catholic and non-Catholic scholars today. I recommend people read his work instead of spread false ideas that he somehow had a problem with “faithful, orthodox Catholics.” He was more faithful and orthodox than any human could expect to be.

A brief biography for anyone so interested: Raymond E. Brown - Wikipedia
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top