A
Very sweet dog. OK, obviously the OP was a little too open-ended for many. Letās tighten it up a bit.Long?
Well, this is neither here nor there. If a man is the measure of all things, then what is the measure of a man? Of far more import, what is the measure of his dog?Of all things the measure is man, of the things that are, that [or āhowā] they are, and of things that are not, that [or āhowā] they are not.
Considerably, indeed immeasurably less than the measure of :bowdown: :bowdown2: :bowdown: :bowdown2: my cat.:yup: :yup: :yup: :yup:Well, this is neither here nor there. If a man is the measure of all things, then what is the measure of a man? Of far more import, what is the measure of his dog?
Nice move!Man may be the measure of all things, but a dog measures man.
I think your first paragraph is what he meant, which is why I also disagree that man is the measure of all things. Protagoras was the founder of the Sophists, sworn enemies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Iām on SPAās side!:knight1:When he said āman is the measure of all thingsā, maybe he was trying to say that all things are subjective - that what something IS, is only what man thinks it is. So then, by such a philosophy, if man things a dog is a worthless mongrel, then it is a worthless mongrel, while if man thinks a dog is a helpful friend, then it is a helpful friend. Or whatever. Of course I donāt agree with this philosophy as it implies that if man did not believe in God, then God would not exist (which is a load of trash).
Alternatively, he might have meant by āman is the measure of all thingsā that anything can be measured by how much it is like man. For example, pizza is like man in the sense that it has a physical form and is made up of some of the same elements, but in most other ways very unlike man as it canāt move or breathe or anything like that. So pizza is only as meaningful in that it is like man, I guess. Angels are like man in many ways except for lacking a physical form and they arenāt bound by time. Dogs are like man except lacking sentience and lacking a spiritual side. I donāt know why this is a useful way to measure things, however.
Me neither. :nope: No. Not evil.Of course, for those of you who do think humans are the measure of all things, I donāt think of you as evil or anything. Necessarily.
Iāve got to run, but Iāll type swiftly.OK, Iāll let the catā¦ erā¦ dog out of the bag. Yesterday a friend and I were talking about do animals go to heaven? Do they have free will? Do they have souls?
And I thought of all the seeing-eye dogs, rescue dogs, guard-dogs out there. All the dolphins that rescued shipwrecked sailors. My neighbourās cat who took care of her when she is in mourning.
We have notions about what a dog is. But is the true measure of a dog?