Planet Mars and the Flood

[twinc]

You’re on ignore. I really don’t have tolerance to argue with someone who rejects scientific facts.

what scientific facts,according to who,perhaps you are confused between true science and pseudo/phony non science and nonsense - twinc

 

[juliamajor]

what scientific facts,according to who,perhaps you are confused between true science and pseudo/phony non science and nonsense - twinc

No, honey .That’s what you believe.Anything that doesn’t fit into your very narrow interpretation of Science and biblical scholarship is considered pseudo by you and a narrow band of slightly strange folk who are intellectual Luddites destroying anything that may be new to them with reckless abandon.

 

[Major_Tom]

David Bowie sends his regards!

I AM David Bowie.

…dang… almost thought I could say it without laughing…!

 

[Major_Tom]

what scientific facts,according to who,perhaps you are confused between true science and pseudo/phony non science and nonsense - twinc

You paint with an awfully broad brush. On your other thread, didn’t you suggest that ‘scientists’ all were against creationism? Not ‘some’ scientists, just ‘scientists’?

Now were did you get your support for creationism, micro-evolution, etc? Could it be… SCIENTISTS (cue the dramatic music)?

Speaking in less generalities may make a good start to a more productive discussion.

One example: Stephen Jay Gould, a biologist who believed in evolution, got into lots of fights with other evolutionists over whether or not evolution occurred as a slow process or one with more intermediate changes.