Planned Parenthood Ploy on Ultrasounds

  • Thread starter Thread starter PLAL
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PLAL

Guest
prolifeaction.org/hotline/2005/0516.htm

Planned Parenthood Ploy on Ultrasounds

We just read a frantic letter from the Natonal Organization for Women, in which they pretended to be terrified that they may lose their sacred right to murder children without restriction. It was a cry-baby letter, difficult to read.

NARAL, the National Abortion Rights Action League, now Naral Pro-Choice America, is sending a similar letter, while Planned Parenthood is trying to get bills passed that would make it virtually impossible for Crisis Pregnancy Centers to allow women to see their babies alive and moving inside their wombs through use of ultrasound.

They are determined here in Illinois and elsewhere to make it too costly and too difficult for the crisis pregnancy centers to show women ultrasounds. They know that nine out of ten women who see their babies moving and watch their rapid heartbeats, will not go ahead with their schedled abortions.

The name of the abortion game is, and has always been, make the cash register ring up a sale. But when a woman sees her baby she doesn’t buy the abortion. So, Planned Parenthood is trying to get laws passed that would makes it too costly for prolifers to use ultrasound.

Their specious argument is that ultrasound might harm the unborn, so specialists must be hired to be on hand at all times. Can you figure that out? First of all, ultrasound specialists say the ultrasound procedure does not harm the baby. But Planned Parenthood claims they want to protect the baby that they are going to cut to pieces.

That’s like not allowing a prisoner on death row to have ice cream with his last meal before his execution, since it is fattening.
 
Fight Illinois Ultrasound Bill

Planned Parenthood must think our Illinois legislators are awfully dumb. If their Illinois bill, HB 2492, the Ultrasound Restriction Act, passes in the General Assembly, they might be right about our legislators. After all, it did pass out of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee recently by a vote of 8 to 3.

So call your own state senator in Springfield at 217-782-2000 and point out the stupidity of this bill. Even the Federal Drug Administration has said there is no evidence whatsoever that an ultrasound can harm the unborn child. Women in Illinois are not seeking such legislation, anyway, only Planned Parenthood and the abortion crowd want it.

A state assembly that believed in the value of Human Life would be on the pro-life side of this issue, urging women to have ultrasounds before even considering an abortion. Our next door neighbor, Indiana, passed a law that at least requires that the abortionist tell women about the availabililty of ultrasound.
 
First of all, ultrasound specialists say the ultrasound procedure does not harm the baby. But Planned Parenthood claims they want to protect the baby that they are going to cut to pieces
I know this isn’t funny, but that one sentence made me laugh.

It reminded me of how we have this need to place labels on alcoholic beverages warning pregnant women they may “harm” their fetuses. Pregnant women who smoke really get the dirty looks don’t they?
But a woman who goes to kill that fetus can get a police escort!
 
This is so ironic and sad. Women “patients” have been killed by abortionists in addition to their preborn children. I’ve read stories about horrible sanitary conditions in abortion mills. These people will do anything to kill and get money.

Lord have mercy on us
Christ have mercy on us
Lord have mercy on us

my Mother my Confidence,
Corinne
 
40.png
Lorarose:
I know this isn’t funny, but that one sentence made me laugh.

It reminded me of how we have this need to place labels on alcoholic beverages warning pregnant women they may “harm” their fetuses. Pregnant women who smoke really get the dirty looks don’t they?
But a woman who goes to kill that fetus can get a police escort!
Great Post!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top