S
spauline
Guest
Hello, Yin Yang,… and yet, looking at the history of the Church over the years, our situation is no worse than earlier ones.
I just had to clarify something?
You must mean WITHIN the Church we are no worse off, for if you meant we are no worse off in the Church’s opposition FROM WITHOUT, you must be out of your mind, or perhaps completely clueless about history!
In AD 1100 or so, the primary opposition to the Church is the Muslims and then the Schismatics, who believe basically everything Catholics believe except mainly the supremacy of the Roman Bishop.
In AD 1600 or so, the primary opposition to the Church includes not only all of the preceding but also myriads of competing Heretics, who deny not only the authority of the Roman Bishop, but also the entire conglomerate of Bishops in General and the Oral Tradition, retaining a Scipture-only Christianity.
In AD 1800 or so, the enemies of the Church include not only all of the preceding but now Infidels (Deists and Rationalists), persons who are no longer even Christians, and who only acknowledge natural religion and reduce it to a mere few principles that are common to all religions: (I) there must be some Supreme Being (II) We should honor this Supreme Being in some sense (III) We should try to be virtuous (IV) If we fail morally, we should feel regret (V) there must be some system of reward or punishment in the afterlife.
In **AD 2000 **or so, the opposition to the Church includes not only all of the preceding, but now a primary culture that is practically, if not actually fully or nearly fully Apostate, taking two primary forms: atheistic materialism, or hedonistic, relativistic materialism.
And so you were saying that Church’s modern situation is no worse off than any other? Honestly, you must not be talking in spiritual language.