Points for/against secularism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PLAT
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PLAT

Guest
Some Christians (don’t know what) claim that Jesus has ordered the world should be secular, using the gospel according to Mark 12:13-17 (sorry I am translating Chinese)

“Things that belong to Kaizer should be returned to Kaizer… God’s should be returned to God.”

Anyway, how is that/not a proof that secularism is right?
What has the Universal Church has to say about it?
 
No, that is not a “proof” for secularism, that is a proof that A) The Bible does not contradict itself and B) you cannot fool GOD.

In the full context of the passage from which you are quoting, the Pharisee’s are attempting to make JESUS contradict HIMSELF by declaring that it is not right to “pay taxes” to Ceaser, JESUS could not answer “yes” or “no” without violating either a Roman or Jewish Law.

So, JESUS had them show HIM what the coin looked like that they were to use to pay the tribute or tax, and it had on the coin a picture of Ceaser, to which JESUS simply pointed out that a Ceaser coin does not have value to GOD, so “…give to Ceaser what is Ceasers and give to GOD what is GOD’s…”
 
Let’s be clear on what we are discussing, what is your definition of “secularism”?

A. Living only in and for the world
B. An environment in which we live, but do not embrace
C. An enemy of the church
D. “The STATE”, to which we owe ALL
E. ?
 
I believe what your concern is, and correct me if I am in error, how and/or what does the Catholic Church teach as regards the ever encroaching secular world and/or government(s)? Paraphrase: How are Catholics to live in increasingly secular societies where the defintion of secular is: the removal of, ignoring of, desired dissection of, limited speech to address faith and the general movement to silence faith and Catholicism from all forms of government and public life. Private only.

Well the basic position is that “if” what the “State , i.e. Secularism” is proposing is not against any teachings of the Catholic Church, then it is acceptable, we can participate. “If” however, it is against a teaching of the Catholic Church, we may not participate, i.e. abortion. And “if” such a secular program becomes mandatory, i.e. open abortions in all hospitals by all doctors without a conscsious clause, then we still cannot particpate, and at that time, all catholic doctors, nurses, administrators, secretaries etc, who would be working for such a hospital and would be in the line of work that would contribute toward abortion have the moral responsibililty to resist. To resist, does not mean armed struggle, it means not performing the work. And if this resistance caused their termination, then so be it.
I used abortion as an example, but it would apply to any such mandatory government program that was in opposition to the teaching of the church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top