Politicizing tragedy

  • Thread starter Thread starter bri89
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bri89

Guest
"But that’s a lesson Americans find it harder than ever to grasp. What Raspberry called “the open warfare that now passes as political debate” has grown ubiquitous. Every development must be given a politicized, partisan spin, preferably with an assumption of the other side’s bad faith. News cannot break without being instantly deployed as a weapon in the culture war. Forest fires break out, and partisans start sniping over climate change. An oil spill befouls the Gulf Coast, and the talking heads swiftly hurl recriminations about government regulation.
Nothing and no one is immune from exploitation. On Monday evening came word of the death of astronaut and physicist Sally Ride, the first American woman in space. Within an hour, Daily Kos writer Dante Atkins, a Los Angeles Democratic Party Central Committee member, had taken to Twitter to attack US House Speaker John Boehner and the National Organization for Marriage. “Just so everyone knows,” Atkins wrote, they “don’t think Sally Ride deserved to marry the person she loved.” Did she deserve to have news of her passing turned instantly into political ammunition?
The most recent obvious illustration of the rush to politicize tragedy was, of course, the political grandstanding that followed the carnage in Aurora, Colo. Particularly egregious was ABC newsman Brian Ross’s slanderous speculation on “Good Morning America” — on the basis of nothing more than a common name on a website — that the theater massacre might be the work of a Colorado Tea Party member. Ross’s recklessness was inexcusable (and ABC later apologized). But I found it nearly as dismaying that when I heard from five conservative friends about the atrocity in Aurora, the very first words each spoke to me were not an expression of horror or grief, but some version of: “Did you hear what Brian Ross said? The mainstream media is despicable!”
Politics is important. Without the peaceful clash of political ideas in the public realm, our democratic liberties couldn’t be sustained. Like anyone who makes a living commenting on public affairs, I understand that our political beliefs and our moral self-image are entwined, often quite emotionally.
But there are limits, or should be. "Sometimes There’s Nothing Wrong with Politicizing a Tragedy,” Time magazine’s Michael Grunwald wrote the other day. Yet when human sorrow becomes just another reason to impugn the politics of those we disagree with, how are we a better or healthier society? There is more to life than “delivering the hard zinger.”

I thought this was a poignant article. I have close relatives that literally can’t see outside the prism of politics. Not to be melodramatic, but I sort of feel like I’m losing my mother to politics. She’s not capable of having non-politicized arguments anymore.
 
"But that’s a lesson Americans find it harder than ever to grasp. What Raspberry called “the open warfare that now passes as political debate” has grown ubiquitous. Every development must be given a politicized, partisan spin, preferably with an assumption of the other side’s bad faith. News cannot break without being instantly deployed as a weapon in the culture war. Forest fires break out, and partisans start sniping over climate change. An oil spill befouls the Gulf Coast, and the talking heads swiftly hurl recriminations about government regulation.
Nothing and no one is immune from exploitation. On Monday evening came word of the death of astronaut and physicist Sally Ride, the first American woman in space. Within an hour, Daily Kos writer Dante Atkins, a Los Angeles Democratic Party Central Committee member, had taken to Twitter to attack US House Speaker John Boehner and the National Organization for Marriage. “Just so everyone knows,” Atkins wrote, they “don’t think Sally Ride deserved to marry the person she loved.” Did she deserve to have news of her passing turned instantly into political ammunition?
The most recent obvious illustration of the rush to politicize tragedy was, of course, the political grandstanding that followed the carnage in Aurora, Colo. Particularly egregious was ABC newsman Brian Ross’s slanderous speculation on “Good Morning America” — on the basis of nothing more than a common name on a website — that the theater massacre might be the work of a Colorado Tea Party member. Ross’s recklessness was inexcusable (and ABC later apologized). But I found it nearly as dismaying that when I heard from five conservative friends about the atrocity in Aurora, the very first words each spoke to me were not an expression of horror or grief, but some version of: “Did you hear what Brian Ross said? The mainstream media is despicable!”
Politics is important. Without the peaceful clash of political ideas in the public realm, our democratic liberties couldn’t be sustained. Like anyone who makes a living commenting on public affairs, I understand that our political beliefs and our moral self-image are entwined, often quite emotionally.
But there are limits, or should be. "Sometimes There’s Nothing Wrong with Politicizing a Tragedy,” Time magazine’s Michael Grunwald wrote the other day. Yet when human sorrow becomes just another reason to impugn the politics of those we disagree with, how are we a better or healthier society? There is more to life than “delivering the hard zinger.”

I thought this was a poignant article. I have close relatives that literally can’t see outside the prism of politics. Not to be melodramatic, but I sort of feel like I’m losing my mother to politics. She’s not capable of having non-politicized arguments anymore.
I actually detest politics and what it has done to my family.

There was a time in the early church when the laity of a community were spiritually responsible for choosing their ‘spiritual ruler’, who was then approved, and ordained by two or three local bishops. What a difference it would make if we as Catholics had the prayerful, thoughtful, and awesome responsibilty of carefully examining and choosing candidates for the spiritual rulership of our local parish, or diocese.

Instead, we spend millions of dollars on campaign ads, and hours of bickering in the choosing and electing of individuals to secular office who will never represent the holiness of Jesus Christ, nor the full teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Is it possible, that we as members of the body of Christ are suffering from a lack of connection to our local church by our attempted subsitution of participation in our secular ‘democracy’?

God’s peace

Micah
 
I actually detest politics and what it has done to my family.

There was a time in the early church when the laity of a community were spiritually responsible for choosing their ‘spiritual ruler’, who was then approved, and ordained by two or three local bishops. What a difference it would make if we as Catholics had the prayerful, thoughtful, and awesome responsibilty of carefully examining and choosing candidates for the spiritual rulership of our local parish, or diocese.

Instead, we spend millions of dollars on campaign ads, and hours of bickering in the choosing and electing of individuals to secular office who will never represent the holiness of Jesus Christ, nor the full teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Is it possible, that we as members of the body of Christ are suffering from a lack of connection to our local church by our attempted subsitution of participation in our secular ‘democracy’?

God’s peace

Micah
I wonder about that as well. There seem to be people who have substituted what was once devotion to the Church and to God with devotion to a poltical party. Scary times.
 
Politicizing tragedy is the american way. Though not as often anymore look how politicians and news personalities still use 9/11 for their political football. To hell with people involved or who lost loved ones involved right? It’s shameful u_u
 
Certain realities are there, whether or not people politicize them – such as Jesus being the messiah and Son of God – if we are to believe what a bunch of peasant Apostles from 2000 years ago said – and I believe them above others, they are quite credible in my books.

Same with climate change & its knock-on effects – I’d believe what scientists, several of whom I’ve come to know, say over what the Exxon/Koch/Scaife-funded climate change denialist industry has to say.

Be wise as a serpent and gentle as a dove…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top