It’s about man’s duty of stewardship towards God’s creation.Can someone address what this topic means theologically?
It means that Mary is the Mediatrix of all Grace. He is going to declare the fifth Marian dogma.Can someone address what this topic means theologically?
However “cultivating and caring” do not only entail the relationship between us and the environment, between man and creation. They also concern human relations. The popes have spoken of a human ecology, closely connected with environmental ecology. We are living in a time of crisis; we see it in the environment, but above all we see it in men and women. The human person is in danger: this much is certain — the human person is in danger today, hence the urgent need for human ecology!
A few days ago, on the Feast of Corpus Christi, we read the account of the miracle of the multiplication of the loaves. Jesus fed the multitude with five loaves and two fish. And the end of this passage is important: “and all ate and were satisfied. And they took up what was left over, twelve baskets of broken pieces (Lk 9:17). Jesus asked the disciples to ensure that nothing was wasted: nothing thrown out! And there is this fact of 12 baskets: why 12? What does it mean? Twelve is the number of the tribes of Israel, it represents symbolically the whole people. And this tells us that when the food was shared fairly, with solidarity, no one was deprived of what he needed, every community could meet the needs of its poorest members. Human and environmental ecology go hand in hand.
POPE FRANCIS
GENERAL AUDIENCE
Saint Peter’s Square
Wednesday, 5 June 2013
What else would it mean?Hm, not sure at all what to make of this. I hope it is in reference to humanity’s relationship to the natural environment.
Like the above quotes from Benedict, I think it could refer to the nature of what a human being is, rather than to the natural environment.What else would it mean?
I share your enthusiasm. It would be great to have an entire encyclical on this important issue, which is often politicized and emotionalized to such an extent that rational discourse becomes difficult, if not impossible.Awesome!!! Living up to his namesake! Pope Francis, like Pope Benedict XVI, is very concerned about the environment. I believe the environment is one of his prayer intentions in one of the upcoming months.
You’ve been reported. Take your anti-Catholic venom elsewhere, and may God guide you to a true understanding of His Church.I wonder no hostility just is their going to be a joint session between the pope and his cardinals and oh I don’t know a Wiccan High priest and a bunch Gaia nuts Gaia is our angry mother for drinking irrigated water we must starve to please her, practice green black magic and burn the bible for to appease the angry goddess?
Although he never wrote an encyclical on it, I know Pope Benedict was very concerned about the environment and did quite a bit of writing on it. I have been meaning to read the books he released on the matter for some time, but I haven’t gotten to it yet.I share your enthusiasm. It would be great to have an entire encyclical on this important issue, which is often politicized and emotionalized to such an extent that rational discourse becomes difficult, if not impossible.
vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.htmlThe Church has a responsibility towards creation and she must assert this responsibility in the public sphere. In so doing, she must defend not only earth, water and air as gifts of creation that belong to everyone. She must above all protect mankind from self-destruction. There is need for what might be called a human ecology, correctly understood. The deterioration of nature is in fact closely connected to the culture that shapes human coexistence:* when “human ecology”*[124] is respected within society, environmental ecology also benefits. Just as human virtues are interrelated, such that the weakening of one places others at risk, so the ecological system is based on respect for a plan that affects both the health of society and its good relationship with nature.
In order to protect nature, it is not enough to intervene with economic incentives or deterrents; not even an apposite education is sufficient. These are important steps, but the decisive issue is the overall moral tenor of society. If there is a lack of respect for the right to life and to a natural death, if human conception, gestation and birth are made artificial, if human embryos are sacrificed to research, the conscience of society ends up losing the concept of human ecology and, along with it, that of environmental ecology. It is contradictory to insist that future generations respect the natural environment when our educational systems and laws do not help them to respect themselves. The book of nature is one and indivisible: it takes in not only the environment but also life, sexuality, marriage, the family, social relations: in a word, integral human development. Our duties towards the environment are linked to our duties towards the human person, considered in himself and in relation to others. It would be wrong to uphold one set of duties while trampling on the other. Herein lies a grave contradiction in our mentality and practice today: one which demeans the person, disrupts the environment and damages society.