I don’t see any reason when discussing the TLM topic to bring the one of sex abuse and zero tolerence policy. Sexual abuse exists and had existed before and after Vatican II with or without OF OR EF of the missal. Two differents topics, apples and oranges.
There is a traditionalist minority who has her specific culture and way of worship and way of living. Some are traditionalists as a family heritage from always, and others are revert of come from ordinary form parishes and want a more engaged form of Catholicism. They are not present in some countries than in others.
The fact they may be only 1% of Catholics is not an argument to restrict their liberty of worship in their prefered form. If they are a small minority, they should not be a problem and no treat to the general Church.
For the latin: the papers given at mass usually give the latin and the vernacular tradition, as the missals. The reading and the homily are given in the vernacular language.
It’s true that we don’t have a lot of latiners these days, the fault to the schools and students choices.
The latin is the official language of the Church, and was the language spoken at the Vatican II council.
On the contrary, the fact vocations folorished is a decicive arguments. the Church will not survive without priests. The curbs are worrying. I don’t see at all, from experience, any effective pastoral of vocations, apart prayers. In my parish, there is no altar boys, nor even children who go regularly at mass. There are no large families, who are the traditional breeding grounds for vocations.
If we are in a dying Church, the debate over TLM or Vatican II is already a fight overwelmed and pointless.