When you say that ‘are not recognized by the Church’; if the Siri thesis was true, the alleged false church would not show that it is run by Masons, as it would lose it’s power and esteem and the Maons plot would be uncovered and ruined.
“Cardinal” Tisserant, Freemason and Dean (Head) of the 1958 Conclave
I am sorry but,(general laughter); it is not slandering the Cardinal, I have already told you that. This is slandering: I am the ugliest and the most silly person who has ever existed.
They were not slandering, they were just trying to reveal who he truly was.
I think you meant beatified, not beautified! And when he calls him[john xxiii] an anti-pope, he is calling him that because he thinks he really is an anti-pope as I have said. But, let us say that John XXIII truly was an anti-pope; who beatified the anti-pope? The alleged false church which accepted the alleged false Mass, thats what. And he was beatified by another supposed anti-pope, who happened to be John Paul II. Always suposing that the Siri thesis is true.
I mean to support no one(let us pretend that I am not supporting the Siri thesis), but John XXIII really was going against church tradition by adopting modernistic thinking(he was a supporter of an italioan modernist who was excommunicated). Why would the Holy Spirit choose a heretical Cardinal? I know that there were some pretty bad and impure Popes, but they werwe not heretics. Maybe one of the reasons supporting the Siri Thesis could be that the Holy Ghost chose Siri the most orthodox Cardinal there ever was(always supposing that the Siri thesis could have happened).
