E
eric3141
Guest
I’ve heard for a while now that the Pope is rumored to change things so that bishops cannot block the traditional latin mass from being said in their diocese. Any news on this? Please pardon my ignorance.
wait, which organizations do these include besides the Institute of Christ the King which I know they currently do, and probably the FSSP. I’m curious. If I wanted a latin mass said regularly at my parish on Sundays, do you think if I could get enough signatures or whatever and I wrote to the pastor, that we could get one? But, my parish is pretty big already and has 8 masses on Sundays, so I dont know where they’d squeeze it in.This is the Motu Proprio that we’ve been talking about. We don’t know exactly what it’s going to say because it hasn’t been published yet. But there is hope and several organizations are offering to train priests in saying the TLM. So, while we’re waiting for it, good things are happening…
Almost certainly the Pope won’t insist on TLMs being said agaisnt the expressed wishes of the bishop. What he might do is change the system so that instead of the TLM being prohibited unless the bishop gives permission, it is permitted unless the bishop forbids it.I’ve heard for a while now that the Pope is rumored to change things so that bishops cannot block the traditional latin mass from being said in their diocese. Any news on this? Please pardon my ignorance.
A Bishop can’t prohibit a lawful, valid Mass. So if the Priest is able to, and the architecture is proper then I can’t see him being able to LAWFULLY forbid a Priest to say it.Almost certainly the Pope won’t insist on TLMs being said agaisnt the expressed wishes of the bishop. What he might do is change the system so that instead of the TLM being prohibited unless the bishop gives permission, it is permitted unless the bishop forbids it.
That’s quite a big change, but it doesn’t overrule the bishops in any way, which is something Popes don’t like doing.
In theory maybe. But the reality is that in most parishes, a priest at the main Mass on Sunday, if there is such a thing, won’t be able to make a last minute decision to say the Latin Mass. But maybe that’s what you meant by “architecture is proper”?A Bishop can’t prohibit a lawful, valid Mass. So if the Priest is able to, and the architecture is proper then I can’t see him being able to LAWFULLY forbid a Priest to say it.
I know before Vatican II, the tabernacle was on the high altar, but most places have them seperate on the side. I’m assuming it must be an absolute must if a priest were to celebrate a Tridentine mass? Since, all the confiteor’s and genuflecting and bowing is directed toward the altar/tabernacle.A Bishop can’t prohibit a lawful, valid Mass. So if the Priest is able to, and the architecture is proper then I can’t see him being able to LAWFULLY forbid a Priest to say it.
Exactly:thumbsup: and also the table that the tabernacle is on has to be wide enough and deep enough for the Chalice and Mass Cards. How many Churches have that now?I know before Vatican II, the tabernacle was on the high altar, but most places have them seperate on the side. I’m assuming it must be an absolute must if a priest were to celebrate a Tridentine mass? Since, all the confiteor’s and genuflecting and bowing is directed toward the altar/tabernacle.
I also noticed, that altars now a days can be made of any sturdy material, none was specified exactly, although marble or granite or some stone is the norm, but I always thought it was an absolute requirement that the consecrating was to be be done on a stone square, i.e. theres a stone at least embedded and consecrated/blessed by the bishop, is that a requirement now? A parish I went to turned the former wooden communion rails into an altar, and theres no stone.Exactly:thumbsup: and also the table that the tabernacle is on has to be wide enough and deep enough for the Chalice and Mass Cards. How many Churches have that now?
I think the bows and genuflecting are directed toward the crucifix. I’ve been at Latin Masses where the center was not the tabernacle.I know before Vatican II, the tabernacle was on the high altar, but most places have them seperate on the side. I’m assuming it must be an absolute must if a priest were to celebrate a Tridentine mass? Since, all the confiteor’s and genuflecting and bowing is directed toward the altar/tabernacle.
If this analysis is correct, then steps have already been taken by those who do not want the Traditional Mass:I’ve heard for a while now that the Pope is rumored to change things so that bishops cannot block the traditional latin mass from being said in their diocese. Any news on this? Please pardon my ignorance.
Hmmm, is it actually a possibility that it’s not directed to Latin Mass people at all but rather groups who celebrate the Eucharist privately- prayer groups or house liturgies and all that, and even for example, the NeoCatechumenal Way?If this analysis is correct, then steps have already been taken by those who do not want the Traditional Mass:
*Sacramentum Caritatis *February 2007
62 Of this document addresses the saying of the Latin Mass at large gatherings
63 addresses the Latin Mass communities.
Hmmm… if you are right about that then this would mean that any priest could use the Anglican Use liturgy, right? This liturgy is approved by Rome – not sure if Rome has limited it to situations where the whole Episcopalian / Anglican parish converts but wants to keep an Anglican style liturgy. In the US there are about 6 parishes that use it.A Bishop can’t prohibit a lawful, valid Mass. So if the Priest is able to, and the architecture is proper then I can’t see him being able to LAWFULLY forbid a Priest to say it.
Hmmm, is it actually a possibility that it’s not directed to Latin Mass people at all but rather groups who celebrate the Eucharist privately- prayer groups or house liturgies and all that, and even for example, the NeoCatechumenal Way?
Read the article and you will see that since #62 concerns the **Latin Mass **in a large-setting it would make since that #63 is about the **Latin Mass **in small settings. This would allow a bishop, that feels that a Latin community is recruiting or encouraging Novus Ordo groups to attend the Latin Mass,to be closed down.Hmmm, is it actually a possibility that it’s not directed to Latin Mass people at all but rather groups who celebrate the Eucharist privately- prayer groups or house liturgies and all that, and even for example, the NeoCatechumenal Way?
Read the article and you will see that since #62 concerns the **Latin Mass **in a large-setting it would make since that #63 is about the **Latin Mass **in small settings. This would allow a bishop, that feels that a Latin community is recruiting or encouraging Novus Ordo groups to attend the Latin Mass,to be closed down.
traditioninaction.org/bev/085bev03-13-2007.htm
At the same time—I would not put it past a bishop–who really does not want the TLM — to use some similar excuse to do away with it or not allow it.
I read the article—but I still disagree. The section you quoted–is more aimed at groups like the Neocatechumenals. I have come across terms like “parallel” and “Church within a Church” to denote the Neocatechumenals.
They should. They elected him Pope, knowing fully well his strong desire for the Traditional Mass.I hope that the motu propio of the holy father benedict xvi on the sacred liturgy (Tridentine Mass) will be accepted by a large number of cardinals including the liberals.