O
OriginalJS
Guest
Years ago I read a book about a French priest who came to America in the 1700’s but through some misadventure lost some part of his body. I can’t recall if it was an arm, a leg, or his private parts. One of his greatest concerns when he recovered was that he could not celebrate mass because he was no longer a complete man physically.
I have also read that no man can receive holy orders whose physical body is not complete, and more specifically that no eunuch could be ordained a priest.
I have never seen one-eyed, one-legged, one-armed or otherwise physically incomplete priest celebrate mass nor have I ever known such a priest. It is possible on casual observation to see if a priest has both arms, legs, eyes, ears, nose etc. but the matter of the sexual organs is another matter.
Is it possible that future popes were phyically examined in a public ceremony to determine if their penes and testicles were indeed intact to avoid the possibility of a eunuch or otherwise castrated man from assuming the papal throne?
I have also read that no man can receive holy orders whose physical body is not complete, and more specifically that no eunuch could be ordained a priest.
I have never seen one-eyed, one-legged, one-armed or otherwise physically incomplete priest celebrate mass nor have I ever known such a priest. It is possible on casual observation to see if a priest has both arms, legs, eyes, ears, nose etc. but the matter of the sexual organs is another matter.
Is it possible that future popes were phyically examined in a public ceremony to determine if their penes and testicles were indeed intact to avoid the possibility of a eunuch or otherwise castrated man from assuming the papal throne?