N
NetNuncio
Guest
You are quite correct…up to the mid-1600s and beginning again in the late 1800s, there were decent compositions. Faure has some lovely pieces (his Requiem was lacking, liturgically, in several respects, despite it’s beauty) as did Bruckner.In some respects that may be true, and there is no argument that we had wonderful compositions prior to 1600. But let’s not forget choral motets (a capella or with organ), other sacred works and organ works composed by Bruckner (his sacred a capella motets), Mozart (many beautiful choral motets, Bach (yes he was a Lutheran, but he did compose appropriate motets and other sacred music for organ), William Byrd (although he composed within the cusp of the latter part of the 1500s and early part of the 1600s), Vivaldi, Caldara, Pergolesi, Ugolini, Allegri (His Miserere especially), Couperin, Charpentier, Frescobaldi, and as you mentioned, Monteverdi. These are just some I can name off the top of my head.
Then we can’t forget the golden age of French organ and sacred music in the mid to late 1800s - Cesar Franck (has some really beautiful sacred works and, no, I’m not talking about his overused, yet lovely, Panis Angelicus), Gabriel Faure (his Ave Maria, Salve Regina, Cantique de Jean Racine, and of course his Requiem. He also composed in the early 20th c) and Louis Vierne to name a few.
So, I wouldn’t necessarily call that time period a wasteland for sacred music.
Vivaldi’s liturgical music, as is Pergolesi’s (he died too young) and Ugolini’s is hardly known. Couperin and Frescobaldi’s organ music is well known yes, but Allegri is survived by hardly anything other than Miserere Mei Deum. Perhaps wasteland is too harsh, but the best period of liturgical music it was not.
Adam