A couple of people have hit some of the important points very well. If I may just throw in my :twocents:
Whether a priest is quiet, composed and rather still during his homilies, or moves around a bit and tends to speak with some fire, is really not important. As was said above, the person’s homilies will often reflect their style of ministry in general (though not always, I have seen some very interesting exceptions.)
What is so crucial to remember, as was also mentioned in an above post, is that the homily is NOT the center of the Mass. Not only is the Eucharist the center point of the Mass, but EVERY other part of the Mass should flow into the Eucharist. The opening music and prayers should prepare us to receive Our Lord. The readings should bring the Word of God to us before we receive His Body and Blood. In the same manner, the homily should really prepare us for the Eucharist. Our hearts and minds should be turned toward God and His mysteries. Should it be calm and touching or enthusiastic and passionate? Doesn’t matter, but it needs to be reverent.
You can play many styles of liturgical music, but to most people a trombone can never contribute to reverent liturgy. There are certainly limits. And the dramatic, fiery preaching that I believe you are referring to, while it may be wonderful during a youth group event or a talk in front of a parish, is distracting and has no place as part of the liturgy.
Also, I would strongly agree with the poster who said to avoid calling this a stereotypical black preaching. There are many white protestants with this preaching style, and many black preachers who are very quiet and reserved. I understand what you meant to convey, but you could say “fiery southern baptist-style preacher” and get the same meaning across.
In Christ and Mary,
Frank