I don’t think that was what I was conveying. I think that we may eventually have a priesthood where the Church ordains married me and celibate men. I have never really understood the jaw flapping over “getting rid of celibacy”. that is ridiculous. And I am well aware of the rule, now followed with married deacons, that if a married man is ordained and his wife dies, his future is celibacy.
Having both a married clergy and a celibate clergy is part of the history of the Church. I seriously doubt, for a multitude of reasons, that allowing married men to be ordained is going to create any rush to the Cathedral.
The rule of celibacy is a disciplinary rule, although some (I am not referencing you) seem to raise it to the level of a doctrine. It is not; and what I have seen personally of married priests (one a prior Presbyterian, the other Episcopal) they are well accepted and have done well in the parishes they have been assigned to.