Priestly promotions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sir_Knight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Sir_Knight

Guest
Can somebody explain how and under what circumstances a priest moves up the ladder. For example, I know that a priest is ordained by a bishop after completing his seminary studies and a Pope is elected by the college of Cardinals when the office is vacant but what about a Monsignor? When and under what circumstances is a priest made a Monsignor and by who?

Same questions for a Bishop?

Archbishop?

Cardnial?
 
As far as I can make out (and a question posed to the apologists section of this forum over two weeks ago has ellicited no response), after training a person receives the sacrament of holy orders. At that time the local ordinary (bishop) outlines what faculties the individual has permission to excersize. That is what distinguishes a deacon from a priest from a bishop. Any change in assignment after ordination is merely the granting of permission to excersize higher levels of priestly faculties. The Vatican through the Congregation for Bishops selects men recommended by the bishops for advancement to the episcopate. Permission to use faculties reserved to bishops comes from the Pope through the Congregation. Bishops may then be elevated to archbishop and cardinal, but these are not higher faculties, but only honorary titles.
Monsignor is another honorary title. It carries no faculties beyond that of a priest.

Matthew
 
As noted, “Monsignor” is a honorary bestowed at the discretion of the Bishop. The Bishop recommends the title to the Vatican, and the Vatican always agrees. The Bishop can confer the title for any reason: outstanding service in a specific function, service over a period of time, or whatever else he wishes. For instance, a Bishop may have a policy that every Priest serving for 20 years will get the title. Or any Priest serving a Diocesan function (Communication Director, or traveling the Diocese to speak about Vocations, etc). Some Bishops don’t use it at all. In my hometown in Ohio I’d heard that Monsignors went the way of the TLM, but when I came to Texas they are quite common (which can’t be said for the TLM).

Going to Bishop probably involves the same skills as getting promoted in any job: Political skills, a knack for management, etc. I presume a Bishop would always have a list of potentials and assign them different functions to see how they do.
 
As a side note on Monsignors, there are a few differant ranks of them, the highest rank getting certain Liturgical privileges, including the right to celebrate Pontifical Mass (with some differances) and wear a miter (but to carry a crozier).
 
Going back a loonngg ways…

Does the Bishop still submit a “Terna” to the Vatican listing 3 priests in his diocese who are worthy of being made a bishop?
 
As a side note on Monsignors, there are a few differant ranks of them, the highest rank getting certain Liturgical privileges, including the right to celebrate Pontifical Mass (with some differances) and wear a miter (but to carry a crozier).
A few high-ranking, elderly *Monsignori *excluded, the curial reforms of 1968 eliminated the celebration of Pontifical Mass by Monsignors. They wear a little more color on their cassocks and birettas, but they no longer wear mitres.
 
A few high-ranking, elderly *Monsignori *excluded, the curial reforms of 1968 eliminated the celebration of Pontifical Mass by Monsignors. They wear a little more color on their cassocks and birettas, but they no longer wear mitres.
I think Msgr. Conlon, chaplain of the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales, has celebrated Pontifical Mass on occaision. He might be older, but isnt exactly elderly.
 
Going back a loonngg ways…

Does the Bishop still submit a “Terna” to the Vatican listing 3 priests in his diocese who are worthy of being made a bishop?
Today I think the process is the regional Bishop’s Conferances submits their reccomendations to Rome. John Paul II usually just rubber-stamped the decision of the conferances (which explains the Mahony’s of the world), although Benedict XVI has been taking the nomination of bishops a little more seriously.
 
Today I think the process is the regional Bishop’s Conferances submits their reccomendations to Rome. John Paul II usually just rubber-stamped the decision of the conferances (which explains the Mahony’s of the world), although Benedict XVI has been taking the nomination of bishops a little more seriously.
I’m sorry, Caesar, can you cite a authoritative source that the Servant of God Pope John Paul II “usually just rubber-stamped” the appointment of bishops or did not take the process seriously? If we mentionthe Maloneys of the world (and I’m sure we agree on that particular name), surely we also have to mention the Burkes, the Bruskewitzs, and the Chaputs?
 
A monsignor is an honorary member of the papal houshold. Or as the joke goes, he gets a bucket and mop. There are degrees of monsignori. At the juridical department in Rome, it is still an essential, in practice, to make priests holding their particular position monsignors. In other places around the world, it may be appropriate to assign the title or merely a sort of honorarium offerred to add a certain semblance of recognition, dignity, respect to the priest’s position or service.

A cardinal is a titular priest of Rome. The College of Cardinals is the sucessive group of clergy to the early Church’s Roman Clergy who elected the pope. A cardinal also receives (in being elevated to that position) a parish in the diocese of Rome with which he is associated. There are degrees of the cardinaliate called “Cardinal Deacon, Cardinal Priest, and Cardinal Bishop.” These are not inherantly equated to the cardinal’s actual degree in holy orders, but rather realted to a protocol typically related to his position within the episcopal heirarcy. Traditionally, there are certain Roman offices whose heads are appointed cardinals. And there are specific dioceses in Italy and around the world which are of such significance that their bishops are also named. (These are usually referred to as “cardinaliate sees”.) And there may be notable bishops, priests, even laymen who the pope desires to include in this number as part of his collaborators. But, ultimately, it is all up to the personal prerogative of the pope. He can even make someone a cardinal “in heart”, without formally naming him and revealing his identity.

You are ordained a bishop after being appointed such by the pope. (Typically in order to fill a neccessary slot as an auxiliary bishop in a diocese or a vacant diocesan see). The pope can directly appoint (though the bishop elect, technically, has to accept his request to take on the assignment). However, usually, this is done after consultation and recommendations are made by the Congregation for Bishops. This Congregation has assessed the sitiuation and needs of the diocese and position requiring appointment, taking into account recommendations by fellow bishops as to who might be a good candidate. An archbishop would be essentially the same situation, except that if he is already a bishop being transferred then he need only be formally appointed (by papal bull) and installed in his new position of authority.

How do priests “move up the ladder?” Some would (not without some truth and good reason) derisively say, “Kiss butt and play the ecclesiatical political game.” Hopefully, there is often something more to it, though, which enables worthy priests who are recognized as humble servants and good leaders in making their journey up the ranks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top