priest's ring

  • Thread starter Thread starter Susan_Calvin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, I cannot give you chapter-and-verse right now. But I can say that it is (at least it was) the custom. Perhaps another poster with better resources can fill that in. The best I can do for the moment is from The Ecclesiastical Review which says:

What that quote says is exactly what we were taught. And by “taught” I hope you get my drift that I do not mean in grade school, or high school, or “religious ed” or anything of the like.
It is no longer prescribed because the canons on rings have been removed in the 1983 Code. However, there are a few directives here and there. It is better to not wear a ring with a large stone since that would be too similar to a bishop’s or abbot’s ring. (Although, I was writing a piece for which I contacted a number of bishops and abbots across the States and Canada and here at lest, rings with stones are going out of fashion in favour of engraving or bas-reliefs).

Indirectly it would seem that wearing a ring at Mass would be discouraged because *Pontificalia Insignia *restricts the wearing of pontificals to certain higher prelates, and the ring is part of the insignia. I suppose, though, it could be argued that a ring is permissible if it is a simple band and wouldn’t be confused for an episcopal ring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top