Primus inter Pares

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael97
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Michael97

Guest
I was wondering if anybody here had experience responding to the Orthodox doctrine of Primus inter Pares, meaning the Pope is the first Bishop amongst equals. I’ve been debating a lot of Orthodox people lately, and their response to many of the church Father’s I invoke is that they only support Papal primacy rather than supremacy.
 
In some sense its true. I would argue that the Pope *is *first among equals. We Catholics emphasize that he is first among equals. The Orthodox emphasize that he is first among equals. As far as the power of orders is concerned, all bishops are equals. There is no fourth degree of Holy Orders. The Pope is a bishop…period. The contention is over power of jurisdiction. I think that’s a good starting point…something we can agree on to some extent.
Its also important to remember that our understanding of the papacy has developed overtime. It is unhelpful if Catholics suggest that, say, the 7th century papacy operated as the 21st century papacy did. Of course the Pope did not micromanage the Church nor appoint bishops in the manner he does today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top