Princeton Bioethicist says only “Know-Nothing Religious Fundamentalists” will Value H

  • Thread starter Thread starter WanderAimlessly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

WanderAimlessly

Guest
They way things are going, Know-Nothing Religious Fundamentalists”will be the only ones left:
Princeton Bioethicist says only “Know-Nothing Religious Fundamentalists” will Value Human Life by 2040
By Hilary White

PRINCETON, December 2, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Infamous advocate of infanticide and the man often credited as the founder of the modern radical animal rights movement, Dr. Peter Singer, was featured in the National Post this week predicting that the traditional ethics of western civilization would shortly be abolished. Singer’s comments appeared first in the September/October edition of the journal Foreign Policy as a speculation on what cherished social institutions would still exist in 35 years.

Full Story
For those who do not know who Peter Singer is, he is the Princeton philosopher to advocates infanticide, euthanasia and bestiality. I heard him being interviewed on a couple of shows in Philadelphia. This person is way out there.

PF
 
I think his estimate is off. It seems to me that only religious people (what he calls know nothing fundamentalists) are the only people who value human life NOW. Terri Schiavo ring a bell?
 
Princeton Bioethicist says only “Know-Nothing Religious Fundamentalists” will Value Human Life by 2040

If that is so, then they will be the only ones left. Is he jealous?
 
tom.wineman said:
Another example of the an educated ignoramus.

Actually, it is an excellent example of how Moral Relativism has created a Culture of Perversion.

PF
 
40.png
WanderAimlessly:
Actually, it is an excellent example of how Moral Relativism has created a Culture of Perversion.

PF
I love it when you talk like that 🙂
 
Unfortunately, his ideas are monstrous but he is very influential, being the author of a book on ethics that is used in many colleges across the country. He actually admits that abortion is the killing of a human being, as opposed to those who do not admit that a developing baby is actually human. But he reasons that the killing is justified if it serves a greater good. There’s really not much to separate him from the Nazis in his view of life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top