I guess you noticed that in the news item no one is called " pro-abortion", an inaccurate, derogatory term.After these billboards appeared in Northern Ireland, pro-abortion people tried to use the law to have the billboards taken down. For one thing, they objected that the word “baby” was used on the billboards.
An accurate term.I guess you noticed that in the news item no one is called " pro-abortion", an inaccurate, derogatory term.
OK, I say white and you say black. Where do we go from here? Do you have any discussion of the issue or should we just leave it?An accurate term.
What ‘choice’ do they support?OK, I say white and you say black. Where do we go from here? Do you have any discussion of the issue or should we just leave it?
If there is a difference of opinion, it is obvious that some choose to have different beliefs, to address your rhetorical question.What ‘choice’ do they support?
No there isn’t. And anybody who believes in the sancity of life before birth would be pro life.“I believe in the sanctity of life, every life, before and after birth. I am not pro-abortion, but I am pro-choice and there is a difference.”
Once again you sorta plop an opinion as an irrebutable fact. Did you even read the column?No there isn’t. And anybody who believes in the sancity of life before birth would be pro life.
That doesn’t hold up to scrutiny, though I wouldn’t call them pro-abortion.“I believe in the sanctity of life, every life, before and after birth. I am not pro-abortion, but I am pro-choice and there is a difference.”
It’s not available for me. From the part I could read they’re arguing that it’s OK to kill somebody who will die soon anyway.Once again you sorta plop an opinion as an irrebutable fact. Did you even read the column?
Never mind then. Just forget it.I don’t need to read the article to point out …
I did read it and it was using a bunch of unlikely and contrived tragic scenarios that ended with the conclusion that only the mother can choose.Never mind then. Just forget it.
The question was if the person made a case for being ‘pro choice’ instead of ‘pro abortion’.I did read it and it was using a bunch of unlikely and contrived tragic scenarios that ended with the conclusion that only the mother can choose.
The article didn’t really defend that either by using scenarios that hardly ever apply.The question was if the person made a case for being ‘pro choice’ instead of ‘pro abortion’.