Prophecy and time theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter thinkandmull
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

thinkandmull

Guest
In this thread I am hoping people don’t turn to Molinism or Calvinism or Hume;s ideas because these aren’t ideas that are satisfying me. My problem is with free will affecting prophecy. God drops a prophecy on us, and the next day someone uses their free will in passing it on, then the next day someone else does the same. Everything after the “drop” is free willed, so how can it be certain that the prophecy will come true. God knows everything but we live in a continuous world of cause and effect, and free will, and linear time.What if Anti-Christ reads the prophecy through the hands of free will passer-onners and decides not to be the Anti-Christ? See my problem? What theory of time can help illuminate this mystery?
 
Nearly every argument attempting to reconcile free will with God’s omniscience (or prophecies in this case) seems to revolve around a peculiar interpretation of what it means for a will to be “free”.

The layman interpretation of free will is that our choices are not set in stone. Catholics seem to think our actions are set in stone in some sense. The common refrain is that God exists outside of time and basically gets to view the universe in its past, present, and future as a completed project. “Free” to the Catholics means something more like being unperturbed by outside influences.

So in other words the short and sweet answer is that our choices are predictable but are nonetheless free since they are made without coercion from some other force.
 
The prophecy concerning the fate of Nineveh if its people didn’t repent, entrusted to Jonah, was true. They did, and its central detail was averted (till a later age when a completely new generation were around and doing whatever in turn they were doing)!
 
Fr. Mitch Pacwa once did a whole EWTN series about the Old Testament Prophets, conditional and unconditional prophecies, etc. You might like it.
 
Prophecy takes into account all freewills involved.

In the first fall of Jerusalem, e.g. Jeremiah urged King Zedekiah to repent. He did not, and God knew all the time he would not. But even though they went down, Jeremiah knew normal life would return, hence the field of Anathoth.

In the time of our LORD, HE knew that no action anybody would take under free-will would prevent the second fall of the city. Hence weep for your children; flee to the mountains; etc. It was coming.

Prophecy also can have a long enough lead time that individual freewills don’t alter it. The remnant of Israel building houses in Ashkelon, predicted in the OT, was fulfilled in the 1900s.

ICXC NIKA
 
The prophecy concerning the fate of Nineveh if its people didn’t repent, entrusted to Jonah, was true. They did, and its central detail was averted (till a later age when a completely new generation were around and doing whatever in turn they were doing)!
I too was thinking of Jonah. He became unhappy because his prophecy “failed.” In a greater sense, his prophecy was a glorious success. He revealed the truth to the people of Nineveh, and they took it to heart and repented.

Prophecy is too often misunderstood as simply envisioning and proclaiming future events. That misses the point. Prophecy is all about discerning or grasping the truth as God reveals it, and transmitting that truth to others for their spiritual benefit. Prophecy as such may relate to future events, but more generally, fundamentally, prophecy is about God’s love and our response.
 
Nearly every argument attempting to reconcile free will with God’s omniscience (or prophecies in this case) seems to revolve around a peculiar interpretation of what it means for a will to be “free”.

The layman interpretation of free will is that our choices are not set in stone. Catholics seem to think our actions are set in stone in some sense. The common refrain is that God exists outside of time and basically gets to view the universe in its past, present, and future as a completed project. “Free” to the Catholics means something more like being unperturbed by outside influences.

So in other words the short and sweet answer is that our choices are predictable but are nonetheless free since they are made without coercion from some other force.
Im weighing the difference posts so far. When you say free will choices are predictable, that verges on Calvinism. There is no way even God can know which piece of fruit you will pick up unless He sees into the future. Free will cannot be determined by anything outside of it. We know what free will is by a clear and distinct vision into our own minds

Does anyone have an opinion of the Anti-Christ not being a specific person but anybody who ends up doing those things? If it is a particular person determined from birth to be the Anti-Christ, what if he accepts Christ when first offered the opportunity and doesn’t sin latter?
 
In this thread I am hoping people don’t turn to Molinism or Calvinism or Hume;s ideas because these aren’t ideas that are satisfying me. My problem is with free will affecting prophecy. God drops a prophecy on us, and the next day someone uses their free will in passing it on, then the next day someone else does the same. Everything after the “drop” is free willed, so how can it be certain that the prophecy will come true. God knows everything but we live in a continuous world of cause and effect, and free will, and linear time.What if Anti-Christ reads the prophecy through the hands of free will passer-onners and decides not to be the Anti-Christ? See my problem? What theory of time can help illuminate this mystery?
Are you talking about a prophesying, decision of a person for example, and s/he decide differently after s/he knows the prophesying? There is no way to resolve the problem if that is the case.
 
Are you talking about a prophesying, decision of a person for example, and s/he decide differently after s/he knows the prophesying? There is no way to resolve the problem if that is the case.
That is EXACTLY my question
 
That is EXACTLY my question
The future is present to God. It can be sure that if He says something will come to pass (unconditionally) then it will, no matter what one does. Either one will succumb to the prophecy’s content willfully, or they will ignore it, or the very attempt at aversion of it will cause it.

Read the story of Oedipus. Or the Gospels, where the Jews, who know the messianic prophecies inside and out fulfill them in detail.
 
:twocents:

A prophecy Is actually a complete understanding of a situation that requires a decision. It is a clear picture of two divergent outcomes of acts that follow a choice that a person must make.

The Old Testament deals with the revelation of the Word of God in time and within a family of people through whom eventually our Saviour would be born.
The choices made by Adam, Noah, Abraham, and Moses among others point to and lead to the incarnation of the Word. Isiah speaks of His coming.

God as the Creator of all time, space, matter and all manner of being, is the eternal, unchanging Ground, transcendent, who enters into and knows every moment.
He is with Cain when He reflects to him where sin is leading, with Jonah as he attempts to run from his destiny. He is there offering the choice and witnessing the decision.

I’m not sure I understand the perplexity over the one reality of omniscience and free will. Look, as far as I can see, God is never going to tell you what you will do unless, I suppose, as an attempt to soothe one’s anxieties about one’s capacity to overcome sin. This might be the case where someone suffers from schizophrenia or severe obsessive compulsive disorder. And, you can be assured that it will happen because God is there as He is everywhere. In this unusual situation, the person would do in the end what he always intended to do.

Other than that, a choice is given; that is the prophesy. And, it has to do with the present moment.
 
I don’t agree that people do what they are always intended to do by God. God might prophesy that He will destroy a city. Nothing we can do about that. But when He enters time and says someone in the future will do something, there is immediately a burst of free will in every direction passing on the prophecy, and perhaps then nobody will choose to fulfill it. Explanations all seem convoluted to me or verge on Calvinism. The prophecies about the Anti-Christ are particularly confusing me :confused:
 
That is EXACTLY my question
Some prophecy is really only a warning, not a certainty. It is a warning to repent otherwise some bad consequence will occur. For example Jonah prophesied that unless Ninevah repented they would be punished. So Ninevah repented and they were spared. In another example Our Lady of Fatima prophesied WWII would happen unless the people repented. And we all know what happened there.

Other prophecy is more a certainty because God has foretold it. The final Judgment for instance. This prophecy does not impede anyone’s free will. However, knowing that there are ultimate consequences to our actions helps us to make better decisions. The final judgement is a sort of putting everything in their proper place and making things right. It only makes sense.
 
Maybe Revelations is more about the devil’s plan than unconditional prophecy
 
Im weighing the difference posts so far. When you say free will choices are predictable, that verges on Calvinism. There is no way even God can know which piece of fruit you will pick up unless He sees into the future.
Are you suggesting that God cannot see into the future?
Free will cannot be determined by anything outside of it. We know what free will is by a clear and distinct vision into our own minds
Actually I don’t think the meaning of “free will” is self-evident at all, hence the millennia of philosophizing on the topic amongst competing schools of thought.
 
Are you suggesting that God cannot see into the future? . . . Actually I don’t think the meaning of “free will” is self-evident at all, hence the millennia of philosophizing on the topic amongst competing schools of thought.
God is One in what is past and future relative to this moment in time. He exists Now, the Ground of each and every now that we inhabit. Reaching into all time, bringing it into being and guiding its transformations back to Himself. His vision of creation is in its entirety. And, it includes us as persons free to become whom we chose. That this is not clear reflects the ignorance that is now a significant part of our nature, resulting from our choice to make ourselves gods, without God. When we decide what is truth, it is no longer truth; perhaps not lies, but illusion nonetheless. That’s why we will never agree.
 
I don’t deny that God knows everything outside of time. But there is only one theory of free will that justifies the doctrine of hell. Molinism is wrong because choices are things that can only be done by a person, not by a “maybe” person. The problem is God inside of time. When He told Moses that the people would fall away, Moses could have passed that on to the people and couldn’t they have chosen not to fall away? Once the prophecy is known, free will can change it. I was inspired the other day when I watch Doctor Strange to work on a better theory of time, which was the theme of this thread. If we see things backwards from what they are, perhaps this problem is avoided. I have much to work on my theory and I can’t describe it well
 
In this thread I am hoping people don’t turn to Molinism or Calvinism or Hume;s ideas because these aren’t ideas that are satisfying me. My problem is with free will affecting prophecy. God drops a prophecy on us, and the next day someone uses their free will in passing it on, then the next day someone else does the same. Everything after the “drop” is free willed, so how can it be certain that the prophecy will come true. God knows everything but we live in a continuous world of cause and effect, and free will, and linear time.What if Anti-Christ reads the prophecy through the hands of free will passer-onners and decides not to be the Anti-Christ? See my problem? What theory of time can help illuminate this mystery?
I may as well rehash a couple of my personal experiences, as I think they’re pertinent to this debate.

First of all, I’ve said ad infinitum that the night my father died, he appeared in my room. The end was pretty grim, finishing with a scream of absolute terror on his part, followed by his abrupt disappearance. However during the proceedings he said at one point, “You’ll meet a pastor. You’ll think he’s great, but all he’ll do is to discourage you even more!”

That was January 1979, and I was an atheist at the time. I became a Christian circa October 1982. I also met a pastor by the name of Rev. Robert Missenden in the Presbyterian Church I was attending at the time. I learnt a lot from him, and developed a great deal of respect for him.

However not that long before he died himself, he said to me in his own office, “I owe you an apology… You needed encouragement, but all I’ve done is to discourage you even more!”

I pointed out to him that he had just repeated my father’s prediction about himslef almost word for word, and he blurted out “You really did see your father that night!”

So that was one personal “prophecy” by my father that came true. However Rev. Missenden was also “prophetic” and I found that if he said he thought something would happen, it invariably did, even if it took time. This uncanny “prophetic” gift he had was one of the reasons I developed so much respect for him.

There were a number of things he predicted which have happened, but the most unexpected was “I think you’ll be doing a cleaning job for a short time. You won’t like it much, and you won’t be doing it for long, but I think the Lord will just want you to hear about a ghost.” There was a bit more, but at the time I thought it was somewhat ridiculous.

Now he probably said that circa 1990 or 1991, as he died himself in January 1992. But in 2006, I did a cleaning job for a short time (about four months), didn’t like it much, and “heard about a ghost” (former manager in an old store who hanged himself downstairs in the 1960’s, if staff were correct). It eventually involved an Australian priest I chanced upon on Catholic Answers Forums, and while it hasn’t led to any concrete action to date, it’s sure featured events way beyond the chances of sheer coincidence.

So… here were a couple of personal “prophecies” which came true, and which angels and the devil were just as much privy to as I was, since they can quite freely listen into our conversations. Yet they still took place.

What did they share in common? Well, first of all I didn’t set out to meet the pastor, nor did I take a cleaning job thinking I might meet a ghost. I wasn’t even thinking about it at the time, and it wasn’t till the young bloke showing me the cleaning round for the first time remarked “This place is haunted” that I started to recall the pastor’s prediction.

Another feature - they took years to occur. My father died in January 1979, and it was over 10 years later before the pastor apologised for “discouraging” me. The pastor made the prediction about the ghost circa 1990/91, but I didn’t do the short term cleaning job till 2006, 15 years later. It was another four years before I chanced up the Australian priest on CAF, and got a mass said (as he just “happened” to be located at the very same parish where the “haunted” store was located). It took another five years before I had another email contact with the same priest due to another “coincidence”, and I still haven’t met him personally to this day.

But I assume there’ll be a reason as the pastor stated “I think the LORD will just want you to hear about a ghost.”

When Christ made the prediction about the destruction of the Temple, it took 40 years to occur. By that time, the only ones who would have remembered it would have been his disciples or other close followers, if they were still alive. His enemies would have ignored it, and probably forgotten it, so they’d have done nothing to stop it.

And their attention would have been on the threat of the Roman armies, rather than the prediction of the Temple destruction.

As a rule then, “Prophecies” tend to be forgotten, until events bring them to pass. Then those who have a memory or tradition of the prophecy in their personal or national consciousness think “Hang on, that’s right, that’s what Joe Blog siad would happen!” So we generally only recognise “prophecy” in hindsight. Consequently we don’t set out to bring the “prophecies” to pass.

But God does, and despite all our alleged “Free Will” choices, He still brings to pass those things He said will happen. How He does this is a moot point, and I for one haven’t got a clue how He does it. But it happens all right. It’s just that by the time it happens, we’ve been pretty much on the point of forgetting about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top