M
Matariel
Guest
I was thinking today as I was watching Mother Angelica on EWTN, and I was thinking about conversion and the way people are open to recieving the Truth (of the Catholic Church).
My cousin, who is a very close friend of mine, came back from California half a year ago, and we spent a lot of time together. He and I are very close friends, and he was baptized as a Presbyterian, but in no way practiced or believed it. Anyway, he was kind of cynical towards Catholicism, but asked me a lot of questions about it, especially when he saw the crucifix and Virgin Mary statue in my room. I did my best to explain Catholicism and it’s apostolic origin and roots, trying to do it without going over his head. Anyway, to my surprise, he asked how he could become Catholic!
He said everything I said sounded more truthful and made more sense than anything he’d heard! So when he comes back from California in January, he’s going to RCIA with me.
At any rate, my godbrother is a staunch evangelical Protestant, and does not understand at all why I converted to Catholicism. He tries to come up with arguements against, but usually he just avoids the topic of religion when around me, which kind of hurt, because it’s almost like an untouchable subject. Anyway, he’s not completely closed to Catholicism, and I think, if we talked about it, he’d be opened up to it, so I’m praying that’s what happens.
Then there is my father-- I struggled so hard to explain to him and my staunch Protestant family why I had to convert, and, after so much talking and explaining to him, he said he undestood that the Baptismal Regeneration, Real Presence and Episcopal set-up (but not Apostolic Succession) and other things of the Catholic faith seemed true. I said, “well, you can’t go on attending a Protestant sect that doesn’t believe in the Real Presence if you do,” and he said, “I don’t know what I believe. If I were to accept the Real Presence or baptismal regeneration, that would ruin the understanding I have of salvation. I’m a Protestant; that’s my identity, and if I was anything else I wouldn’t be who I am.”
I was* very *upset.![Frowning face with open mouth :frowning: 😦](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f626.png)
But it got me thinking. My cousin, a nominal, unbelieving Protestant was so quick to believe, and yet my father, who has spent years building up his own theology and understanding, and attends Protestant services every Sunday, and who attempted to raise me Protestant, was the least open.
Why is it that people “set in” Protestantism, who have built their scriptural understanding up from scratch, and embrace their private interpretation so tightly (usually anti-Catholic too) are so closed to the Truth?
Why was my cousin so open, andmy own father so closed? Why is my godbrother inbetween? It seems to reflect their own understanding and teachablility.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
My cousin, who is a very close friend of mine, came back from California half a year ago, and we spent a lot of time together. He and I are very close friends, and he was baptized as a Presbyterian, but in no way practiced or believed it. Anyway, he was kind of cynical towards Catholicism, but asked me a lot of questions about it, especially when he saw the crucifix and Virgin Mary statue in my room. I did my best to explain Catholicism and it’s apostolic origin and roots, trying to do it without going over his head. Anyway, to my surprise, he asked how he could become Catholic!
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
At any rate, my godbrother is a staunch evangelical Protestant, and does not understand at all why I converted to Catholicism. He tries to come up with arguements against, but usually he just avoids the topic of religion when around me, which kind of hurt, because it’s almost like an untouchable subject. Anyway, he’s not completely closed to Catholicism, and I think, if we talked about it, he’d be opened up to it, so I’m praying that’s what happens.
Then there is my father-- I struggled so hard to explain to him and my staunch Protestant family why I had to convert, and, after so much talking and explaining to him, he said he undestood that the Baptismal Regeneration, Real Presence and Episcopal set-up (but not Apostolic Succession) and other things of the Catholic faith seemed true. I said, “well, you can’t go on attending a Protestant sect that doesn’t believe in the Real Presence if you do,” and he said, “I don’t know what I believe. If I were to accept the Real Presence or baptismal regeneration, that would ruin the understanding I have of salvation. I’m a Protestant; that’s my identity, and if I was anything else I wouldn’t be who I am.”
I was* very *upset.
![Frowning face with open mouth :frowning: 😦](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f626.png)
But it got me thinking. My cousin, a nominal, unbelieving Protestant was so quick to believe, and yet my father, who has spent years building up his own theology and understanding, and attends Protestant services every Sunday, and who attempted to raise me Protestant, was the least open.
Why is it that people “set in” Protestantism, who have built their scriptural understanding up from scratch, and embrace their private interpretation so tightly (usually anti-Catholic too) are so closed to the Truth?
Why was my cousin so open, andmy own father so closed? Why is my godbrother inbetween? It seems to reflect their own understanding and teachablility.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?