Psalm 91 translations

  • Thread starter Thread starter yellow8yellowM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

yellow8yellowM

Guest
I am curious about how the following translations can be so different. Does anybody know what the actual Hebrew says?

*“He that dwelleth in the aid of the most High, shall abide under the protection of the God of Jacob” (Psalm 91:1, Douay-Rheims).

“He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High, who abides in the shadow of the Almighty…” (Psalm 91:1, RSV)*

It seems that there is not just a big difference in the words, but in the verb tense as well. This is true throughout Psalm 91.
 
The Septuagint is different from the Hebrew and draws from a different Hebrew manuscript tradition than the Masoretic Hebrew of today, but the Vulgate draws from both (particularly in the Psalms). This has an effect both on Hebrew wording and on the reading of Hebrew words. This has not traditionally been seen as a drawback; the Septuagint has been regarded as a particularly holy and useful translation by Christians, and was of course the Bible version most familiar to Greek-speaking Jews and Early Christians. (Which was pretty much everybody.) It tells us how the pre-Christian Jews translating the Septuagint thought the Hebrew Bible should be interpreted. That’s why it’s traditional to read Greek, Latin, and English versions of the Bible side by side, when studying a passage.

Here’s what the NETS translator of the Septuagint has to say about verb translation from Hebrew to Septuagint Greek:

In the Septuagint, “the Hebrew verbal categories of tense-aspect presented something of a problem to the Greek translator…” So the translator chose default equivalents and stuck with them. “Thus Hebrew yiqtol forms are usually translated by the Greek future indicative, the qatal by the aorist indicative, and the participle often by the present indicative. It should be noted, however, that participles are also often translated by participles, even though that may produce either strained syntax in the Greek or an obvious change of syntax… the defaults produced a certain stiltedness and abruptness in the use and sequence of Greek tenses.”

He also says that tons of different Hebrew words get translated into Greek as being about “help” or “support” or “shelter”.

So the excruciatingly literal NETS translation of your line in Septuagint Greek is:

“He who lives by the help of the Most High,
in a shelter of the God of the sky he will lodge.”

Welcome to the wonderful world of Bible translation!
 
I am curious about how the following translations can be so different. Does anybody know what the actual Hebrew says?

*“He that dwelleth in the aid of the most High, shall abide under the protection of the God of Jacob” (Psalm 91:1, Douay-Rheims).

“He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High, who abides in the shadow of the Almighty…” (Psalm 91:1, RSV)*

It seems that there is not just a big difference in the words, but in the verb tense as well. This is true throughout Psalm 91.
The one (male) dwelling in the secret place of Elyon [the Most High], the one (male) who will continually lodge in the shadow of Shaddai [usually translated “Almighty”]…
 
All interesting translations. I don’t see any which are wrong.

Psalm 91

1 αἶνος ᾠδῆς τῷ Δαυιδ ὁ κατοικῶν ἐν βοηθείᾳ τοῦ ὑψίστου ἐν σκέπῃ τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ αὐλισθήσεται

1 Qui habitat in adjutorio Altissimi, in protectione Dei cæli commorabitur.

1 He that dwells in the aid of the most High, shall abide under the protection of the God of Jacob.

Seems like a simple concept:

He who dwells in the help/aid of the Most High will stay/linger in/under the protection/shelter of the God of Heaven.
 
I am curious about how the following translations can be so different. Does anybody know what the actual Hebrew says?

*“He that dwelleth in the aid of the most High, shall abide under the protection of the God of Jacob” (Psalm 91:1, Douay-Rheims).

“He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High, who abides in the shadow of the Almighty…” (Psalm 91:1, RSV)*

It seems that there is not just a big difference in the words, but in the verb tense as well. This is true throughout Psalm 91.
I must say others have provided great translations of the Hebrew. The nouns of the Douay-Rheims are not exactly what is said in the Hebrew, but they capture the concept well. That being said, I am not sure where the second participle is coming in the RSV version. It’s been awhile on my hitpolal paradigms, but I am reasonably sure that the verb here is imperfect tense, so “he will abide”
 
The Septuagint is different from the Hebrew and draws from a different Hebrew manuscript tradition than the Masoretic Hebrew of today, but the Vulgate draws from both (particularly in the Psalms). This has an effect both on Hebrew wording and on the reading of Hebrew words. This has not traditionally been seen as a drawback; the Septuagint has been regarded as a particularly holy and useful translation by Christians, and was of course the Bible version most familiar to Greek-speaking Jews and Early Christians. (Which was pretty much everybody.) It tells us how the pre-Christian Jews translating the Septuagint thought the Hebrew Bible should be interpreted. That’s why it’s traditional to read Greek, Latin, and English versions of the Bible side by side, when studying a passage.

Here’s what the NETS translator of the Septuagint has to say about verb translation from Hebrew to Septuagint Greek:

In the Septuagint, “the Hebrew verbal categories of tense-aspect presented something of a problem to the Greek translator…” So the translator chose default equivalents and stuck with them. “Thus Hebrew yiqtol forms are usually translated by the Greek future indicative, the qatal by the aorist indicative, and the participle often by the present indicative. It should be noted, however, that participles are also often translated by participles, even though that may produce either strained syntax in the Greek or an obvious change of syntax… the defaults produced a certain stiltedness and abruptness in the use and sequence of Greek tenses.”

He also says that tons of different Hebrew words get translated into Greek as being about “help” or “support” or “shelter”.

So the excruciatingly literal NETS translation of your line in Septuagint Greek is:

“He who lives by the help of the Most High,
in a shelter of the God of the sky he will lodge.”

Welcome to the wonderful world of Bible translation!
👍
 
The* Bible de Jérusalem* keeps the two names of God in their Hebrew form, thus ;

Qui habite le secret d’Élyôn
*passe la nuit à l’ombre de Shaddaï, *

Élyon is translated in in Greek and Vulgate by Most High and ShaddaÏ by the Almighty

So in English it would be :

He who inhabits the secret of the Most High
spends the night in the shadow of the Almighty.


This is close to the RSV translation.

Compare with this Jewish translation of the Bible :

1 O thou that dwellest in the covert of the Most High, and abidest in the shadow of the Almighty; (“covert” means “shelter”)

Verbum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top