M
Monica4316
Guest
I remember something that my priest once said, but I don’t fully know the theology behind the idea so I was wondering if anyone here could explain it to me… 
he said that there’s a difference between saying that Christ is present physically, and Sacramentally. The Eucharist is Jesus’ Body and Blood, but and He is really - not symbolically there - but Sacramentally/substantially rather than physically/materially. He is actually present, not just spiritually…but there seems to be various ways that He is “substantially” present? Does “physically” present imply that the accidents are also changed, not only the substance? (I think my priest said this point too and linked it back to substance/accidents).
Does anyone know what I’m talking about here?
I just wanted to learn more about the Eucharist, and I’ve always found this part of it difficult to understand/confusing.
thanks
he said that there’s a difference between saying that Christ is present physically, and Sacramentally. The Eucharist is Jesus’ Body and Blood, but and He is really - not symbolically there - but Sacramentally/substantially rather than physically/materially. He is actually present, not just spiritually…but there seems to be various ways that He is “substantially” present? Does “physically” present imply that the accidents are also changed, not only the substance? (I think my priest said this point too and linked it back to substance/accidents).
Does anyone know what I’m talking about here?
I just wanted to learn more about the Eucharist, and I’ve always found this part of it difficult to understand/confusing.
thanks