M
momof8
Guest
I went to a presentation by Christopher West and would have liked to ask this question: Nakedness is portrayed as good in the Garden of Eden, but it still seems to me that clothing is appropriate because not all levels and kinds of nakedness are appropriate between all people. Wouldn’t Adam and Eve have had a nakedness appropriate to each other alone, and don’t clothes protect that particular relationship? In other words, while I realize that one aspect of clothing is that it is a protection against lust, a protection that wasn’t needed before the fall, wouldn’t different levels of intimacy still be appropriate between different people if there had never been a fall? In a perfectly ordered society, say, in heaven, I would not have to “hide” myself emotionally or spiritually from other people. But here on earth, where there are relationships that need to be defined in a certain way because of the nature of the relationship (families in general and married couples in particular), wouldn’t clothing basically be a good symbol for and expression of the facts of those relationships, even without the complication of the Fall?
Has anyone heard Christopher West or another TOB speaker address this type of question?
Has anyone heard Christopher West or another TOB speaker address this type of question?