Questions on SSPX supplied jurisdiction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Acorn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Acorn

Guest
Hi! I have a question to all traditional Catholics especially to sspxers about the SSPX supplied jurisdiction before Pope Francis wrote out his letter in 2017. . . .

But what about now when there are many other traditionalist groups like the fraternity and Institute of Christ the King which do have jurisdiction. As you know, wherever there’s an sspx Chapel the fraternity plants themselves right by them. So if a person wanted to get married by an sspx priest but yet both fraternity and The Institute of Christ the King was in the same town what should he or she do? Would the society still have supplied jurisdiction if there are other options of a valid marriage from these other traditionalist groups without error of instruction? How far does supplied jurisdiction really go?
 
Last edited:
I don’t think is any longer a real issue as the SSPX are de facto now granted faculties to do weddings by most of the Bishops especially in the USA.
 
Looking back I didn’t word it right. What I meant was somebody who has already gotten married before the Pope’s letter in 2017.
 
My question is: Would the sspx have had to still rely on Supply jurisdiction if the person had the option of going to the fraternity or The Institute of Christ the King for marriage? Would supply jurisdiction still fall in place for the sspx? (At the time, meaning before the Pope’s letter in 2017)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top