B
benedictgal
Guest
And, there is a precedent for the recognitio from the Holy See, as there are rituals for the Quince Anos celebration in the liturgical books of the Mexican Episcopal Conference. Although the Quince Anos is not included in the Mexican Episcopal Conference’s version of the Roman Missal, it either has its own little book or it is embedded within their version of the Book of Blessings.Cavaille,
We have many examples of the Church taking a secular event and marking it with a special blessing of the person.
Quasi-sacramental status may sound a bit negative, yet that is the very definition of the word “sacramental” (as opposed to the word Sacrament).
Any ceremony in the church might be abused by some people (we see this especially in weddings). But that doesn’t mean that the Church should not allow sacramentals to be celebrated in the proper way.
As for an a reasonable case for allowing them, the Holy See has given approval. That’s a pretty strong argument in my opinion.
Let me give y’all a little insight as to why the USCCB decided to put this “ritual” into some sort of format. Our immediate former diiocesan director of Divine Worship was part of a committee that worked on this issue and studied it. He explained to me how the situation played out and why the particular action was taken.
The Mexican-American faithful living in the northern part of the United States complained that there were pastors and priests who did not allow a Quince Anos bleslsing to take place during the Mass, let alone anywhere else, even though this was a matter of inculturation. The faithful, evidently, complained to their local ordinaries and somehow, the USCCB decided to set up something, almost along the lines of what is found in Mexican Episcopal Conference, had it done in both languages and then sent it off to Rome. The amendment that the USCCB made to the Mexican version was that instead of having the blessing take place after the homily, it was moved to after the post-communion prayer.
Now, here is the caveat down here: many of the parishes are still folloiwng the Mexican Episcopal Conference’s version of the Quince Anos blessing. That was a bone of contention I had with our former diocesan director. Now that we have our own book, with the necessary recogitio from the Holy See, why should we follow MEC? Worse yet, he was the one who was still following the MEC ritual, even though the USCCB version has aleardy been out one year.
Evidently, no one down here was aware of this until I brought it up to the attention of my pastor, my parochial vicar and a priest friend of mine. To my knowledge, both my PV and my priest friend have already begun using the correct form. I will be forwarding a copy to the new adminsitrator of the Cathedral because they are still using the MEC format. Go figure.