M
mkipp
Guest
I am in RCIA now and was wondering what happens at Easter Vigil. Gob Bless
Don’t mean to be off topic either, but I can’t wait too!!! Ok, sorry…Not to get off topic, but I can’t wait! I’m nervous and excited at the same time.
Ok, back to the topic…
![]()
Does this mean you’ve already been baptized? If so, that changes things substantially. You don’t need to be received into the Church at the Easter Vigil. (I’d say that you shouldn’t be received at the Easter Vigil. In my archdiocese the cardinal has made it clear that the Vigil is for catechumens only.)All this does seem absurd to me, however, coming from an evangelical Protestant background. Why can’t we, if you give me the ‘we’ and think of me as a Catholic, open arms and bring people on-board so to speak, then work with them?
I don’t know if I’m correct with regard to official church teaching, but my take on why we don’t just open our arms to let you in and then let you commit later is because becoming Catholic is a lifetime commitment, like marriage.Why can’t we, if you give me the ‘we’ and think of me as a Catholic, open arms and bring people on-board so to speak, then work with them?
RCIA resembles a trial in many potentially off-putting respects, as attested by the absence of several people who started with me last year and have not been seen again for RCIA.
RCIA is a great idea, but with big, big issues if you ask me. You don’t grow a church or any enterprise) by putting up such huge entry barriers, that’s just a cold, hard fact.
I understand protestants take baptism seriously, but it’s baptism into Jesus Christ, where ever he may be, I guess, is how I see it. I’m sure I’m not conveying this correctly, but the Catholic baptism isn’t just tied to accepting Jesus into one’s life, it’s tied to doing so through his church, THE Catholic church. We can’t go to other services to find him there because they don’t have the sacraments Jesus left us, but for denominations who consider baptism in Christ all you need, is it ok to attend a Methodist service one week, a Baptist service another and a Evangelical Free service the following one? I was under the impression, perhaps erroneously, that protestants believe it doesn’t matter where one worships, just that they believe in Jesus.I agree with what you say regarding the lasting commitment of joining the church, and that it is not something to be taken lightly.
I disagree that Protestants take such things as baptism lightly. I grew up in a fundamentalist Baptist family, baptized not as an infant but as a late teenager with open eyes backed by a clear decision, as is typical. I was not baptized with the expectation that I would church hop, either. It was a rather serious affair. Baptist ministers used to criticize Catholics for infant baptism precisely because of the seriousness of the commitment, as a matter of fact.
I know the church recognizes Trinitarian baptism so if that’s what was invoked in yours it makes sense.Yes, the Methodists and the Presbyterians and so forth will take my Southern Baptist baptism as authentic. As does the Catholic church, too, as it turns out. I’m a “candidate”, not a catechumen.
Something I give full credit to that movement for, too. They’re really good about getting that message across, especially in music. Alas, as humans, we all fail to walk the walk as much as we should.Protestants are keen to talk about “the Walk”, a difficult life-long process of maturation and growth as a Christian, a journey whose first step is baptism in Christ. It is not so far apart from the Apostolic or Catholic conception if you ask me.
As a matter of fact, I my “walk” has led me to Rome as it were. What famous Protestant who, upon surveying the Church Fathers, was surprised to say, “to be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant?”
I do believe the other denominations do serve a purpose for the Lord in instilling the fire, the desire, to fully know Christ so that by the time they consider the Catholic church they can truly appreciate the gift of the Real Presence they will receive when they commit themselves to Catholicism.Well it’s all no matter, anyway. I’ll get through this RCIA, even if it takes until next year before they let me. Until whatever time I’ll just be the eternal candidate it seems.
…
Protestants are keen to talk about “the Walk”, a difficult life-long process of maturation and growth as a Christian, a journey whose first step is baptism in Christ. It is not so far apart from the Apostolic or Catholic conception if you ask me…
Essentially – it is “life-long”, that is once you are “born again”. Of course Protestant practices are varied, but in general baptism is preferred to happen once people acheive “the age of reason”. I suppose this is akin to the preference of Catholics to have confirmation at roughly the same life stage.
I agree, my question, if it is “life-long” that includes childhood, it could not start with a formal baptism if that formal baptism is teenager or older. Baptism signifies a free will decision to follow God. Catholic Tradition is to baptize infants as Paul does in the bible. These children are raised to follow god.
btw - in the 1960’s the process was 7 weeks. Pope Gregory taught 40 days, as the 40 days of discernment in the bible.
and thus the problem, by that logic you have to be “born again” alone, then seek baptism from themEssentially – it is “life-long”, that is once you are “born again”…
I disagree because the catholic kids are are disciples before this sacrament, while the protestant kids are what?Of course Protestant practices are varied, but in general baptism is preferred to happen once people achieve “the age of reason”. I suppose this is akin to the preference of Catholics to have confirmation at roughly the same life stage.
There is a recruiting issue there.A complicating factor, of course, is the disavowal of many Protestant sects from the idea of confirmation or chismation. I think a lot of unwarranted criticism from many Protestants results in confusion and misunderstanding over how different things because of this.
actually before the restored RCIA the process could take a few weeks for a baptized non-Catholic, or even several years for an unbaptized person, it was much more flexible and depended very much on the individual priest or bishop. In mission territories especially a longer time frame for teaching pagans was the rule to avoid forced baptisms.btw - in the 1960’s the process was 7 weeks. Pope Gregory taught 40 days, as the 40 days of discernment in the bible.