Reasons you love Chant or Palestrina... or both?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cathguy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you love Chant? If so why?
Yes, I love chant because:

This is the article that talks about the history of Gregorian chant; it also mentions that “active participation” (a term used even before the Vatican II Council) has always meant singing Greogorian chant.
catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0540.html
Here are some quotes:
In any case, the first use of actuosa participatio, i.e., active participation, referred explicitly and exclusively to the restoration of the congregational singing of Gregorian Chant. In 1928, Pope Pius XI reiterated the point in his Apostolic Letter, Divini Cultus. Nineteen years after that, in the Magna Carta of liturgical reform, Mediator Dei, issued by Pius XII, the same term was used with the same meaning. So until the Second Vatican Council, the term “active participation” referred exclusively to the singing of Gregorian Chant by the people.
…]
*I was amazed. I called Professor William Mart, a Professor of Music at Stanford University and a friend. I said, “Bill, is this true?” He said, “*Yes. The Psalm tones have their roots in ancient Jewish hymnody and psalmody.” So, you know something? If you sing the Psalms at Mass with the Gregorian tones, you are as close as you can get to praying with Jesus and Mary. They sang the Psalms in tones that have come down to us today in Gregorian Chant.

These are good chant websites:
musicasacra.com/
romaaeterna.jp/index1.html

These are interesting articles:
St. Thomas Aquinas on music: tinyurl.com/aquinmusic
Do you love the multi-voice Masses of the Renaissance? Why?
Yes, but I can see why the Council of Trent almost banned polyphony; it can get a little arrogant if not both composed and sung well.
Do you prefer a High Mass or Low Mass? Is traditional Catholic music related to your preference?
High Mass of course!
Who is your favorite Catholic composer, or composer of Masses?
Palestrina’s Missa Papæ Marcellæ is the most beautiful polyphony I have ever heard, although I haven’t heard much else of Palestrina. For simple chant, I like Veni Sancte Spiritus, Adoro te devote, and Te Deum. Lotti has some very good, easy-to-sing polyphony.

Do you guys know of any other good works by Palestrina besides his Missa Papæ Marcellæ?
 
I love unaccompanied chant, from Gregorian to Byzantine to Maronite to Old Roman. I prefer it to any other type of sacred music, though I do love polyphony when it’s done well. Not only is it ancient, but it also fits the texts to music in an uncanny way.

As for favorite composers, my favorite is Estonian Orthodox Arvo Pärt, though technically most of his compositions would probably fall under the homophonic label rather than the polyphonic one. I also love Stravinsky’s Mass, though he too was Orthodox.
 
I love unaccompanied chant, from Gregorian to Byzantine to Maronite to Old Roman. I prefer it to any other type of sacred music, though I do love polyphony when it’s done well. Not only is it ancient, but it also fits the texts to music in an uncanny way.

As for favorite composers, my favorite is Estonian Orthodox Arvo Pärt, though technically most of his compositions would probably fall under the homophonic label rather than the polyphonic one. I also love Stravinsky’s Mass, though he too was Orthodox.
Amen. When I first attended Divine Liturgy, the Subdeacon who sings very, very well had a friend over who not only sings as good as the Subdeacon, he has a very complementary voice than blends very well. They could have made a Divine Liturgy CD right there and then if they wanted to.
 
Do you guys know of any other good works by Palestrina besides his Missa Papæ Marcellæ?
Hi Geremia: Missa Galieni, (men of Galilee, the first words the Angel spoke to the apostles) which is the setting for Ascension Day.

The mixture the glory of the even, and the sadness of the Apostles defies description.

Ascention Day is one of my favorite holidays, btw/
 
This is a very unfortunate topic for me to have stumbled on to… because I could go on for hours and hours! 🙂 I have always thought that (apart from the intensity and majesty of the Word of God) music is the first medium by which God speaks to us; or, at least, to me! Sacred music specifically has a very special purpose! It literally consists of our fellow human beings, our brothers and sisters, piercing our hearts with divine glory. Chant, Polyphony, Baroque, and most Classical sacred music has this tremendous effect.

For me, there are three distinct levels of the imagination which are spoken to by sacred music.

The Gregorian-notation chants activate the highest, most perfect and utterly simple realms of the human mind. This music speaks to the kernel of our souls! It is the ‘music of God’, which exposes His holy Word without any accompaniment or embellishment. Every note covers a word or syllable, and God’s sacred simplicity is reflected in its directness. You might call simple monophonic chant “blunt”. This is the world of the Divine Trinity, ever in simple communication and communion with each other as One God! There is no polyphony: only the ever-rotating melody of a single Lord echoed in love upon Himself.

The Polyphonic chants activate a slightly lower realm, which ironically seems much higher to us because of its complexity. 😛 I believe polyphonic music is an echo of the angelic salutations to God; for example, I firmly believe the Seraphim sing in polyphonic parts when eternally praising Him! Whenever I hear a Mass, Requiem, Psalm, or Motet by Lassus, Palestrina, Byrd, or Tallis, I know the Kingdom has opened before my eyes. All the terraces, meadows, fields, avenues, forests, oceans, distant stars, and emerald blades of grass consummated in the Heavenly Jerusalem are here represented. It’s a climax of anywhere from 3 voices to 40 voices, after all. It’s a world without simplicity, where everything shines so brightly and with such luminosity that it must dazzle the soul.

The Baroque settings reach the climax of human passion and glorification of God, but are on the lowest level of the imaginative impulse. 😉 I say they are lowest because the Baroque era introduced musical instruments into the fray. This is not necessarily bad or good, but it does bring the purely spiritual wonderment of angelic voices down to a more earthly level. Often, this is the first type of music which leads us to higher, less “base” sacred music. Baroque settings are distinct, in the imagination, from the otherworldly simplicity of Chant and the supernatural complexity of Polyphony, because the Baroque’s man-made orchestras and organs are ‘secular’. The Holy Mass on Earth, accompanied by pomp, circumstance, authority, and shining lights, is what I see in the Baroque!

In my sprawling inner-world, Gregorian Chant is equal to God’s conversation within the Trinity. Polyphonic music is equal to the endless billions upon billions of angels ever-communicating with God. Baroque (and Classical) music is equal to a royal ceremony in honour of God the King, put on by His poor little children, the human race. I suppose I could go further and say that Romantic-era hymns, with their simple emotion and piety, are like the private prayers of children… you know what I mean.

Each genre in sacred music has its own symbolic representation of a position in the hierarchy of the Universe. How can anyone hear the single voice of Gregorian music echoing down the corridors of an ancient church and not think of God’s voice resounding in the Halls of Might at the end of time? How can anyone hear the polyphony of all the Renaissance years and not take away a sense that the glorious army of martyrs, prophets, apostles, angels, and saints marches to the horizon to fight the good fight, and to win the race with Satan? How can anyone hear the circumstance of modern orchestral accompaniment of the ancient chants, and not pick up something of the eternal majesty of God our King, presiding over a massive congregation, all bowed before Him?

Music is the greatest gift in the Universe, after life and Christ.
 
The Gregorian-notation chants activate the highest, most perfect and utterly simple realms of the human mind. This music speaks to the kernel of our souls!
Card. Newman describes it as “inchoate,” but he in no way meant it disparagingly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top