Reform of the music?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joelacour
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

joelacour

Guest
Sacred Music Needs Governing, Says Director of Institute
States Deviations After Vatican II Have Been Rampant

ROME, NOV. 8, 2007 (Zenit.org).- Perhaps a pontifical office with authority over sacred music would correct the abuses that have occurred in this area, suggested a Vatican official.

Monsignor Valentín Miserachs Grau, director of the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music, said this at a conference last Saturday, marking the 80th anniversary of the diocesan institute of Sacred Music of Trent, L’Osservatore Romano reported.

The pontifical institute directed by the monsignor was originally established by the Holy See in 1911. It is an academic institution dedicated to teaching and also performing sacred music. But, Monsignor Miserachs said, “In my opinion, it would be opportune to establish an office with authority over the material of sacred music.”

Need

Monsignor Miserachs contended that “in none of the areas touched on by Vatican II – and practically all are included – have there been greater deviations than in sacred music.”

“How far we are from the true spirit of sacred music, that is, of true liturgical music,” he lamented. “How can we stand it that such a wave of inconsistent, arrogant and ridiculous profanities have so easily gained a stamp of approval in our celebrations?”

It is a great error, Monsignor Miserachs said, to think that people “should find in the temple the same nonsense given to them outside,” since “the liturgy, even in the music, should educate all people – including youth and children.”

“Much music written today, or put in circulation, nevertheless ignores not only the grammar, but even the basic ABC’s of musical art,” he continued. “Due to general ignorance, especially in certain sectors of the clergy,” certain media act as loudspeakers for “products that, devoid of the indispensable characteristics of sacred music – sanctity, true art, universality – can never procure the authentic good of the Church.”

A reform

The monsignor called for a “conversion” back to the norms of the Church. “And that ‘norm’ has Gregorian chant as its cardinal point, either the chant itself, or as an inspiration for good liturgical music.” He noted that his recommendations are not related to Benedict XVI’s document on the use of the 1962 Roman Missal.

“‘Nova et vetera,’” he urged, “the treasure of tradition and of new things, but rooted in tradition.”

Monsignor Miserachs suggested that contact with tradition should “not be limited to the academic realm, or concerts or records.” Instead, “it should become again the living song of the assembly that finds in it that which calms their deepest spiritual tensions, and which makes them feel that they are truly the people of God.”

email this article:
zenit.org/article-20951?l=english
 
"Much music written today, or put in circulation, nevertheless ignores not only the grammar, but even the basic ABC’s of musical art," he continued. “Due to general ignorance, especially in certain sectors of the clergy,” certain media act as loudspeakers for “products that, devoid of the indispensable characteristics of sacred music – sanctity, true art, universality – can never procure the authentic good of the Church.”

The monsignor called for a “conversion” back to the norms of the Church. “And that ‘norm’ has Gregorian chant as its cardinal point, either the chant itself, or as an inspiration for good liturgical music.” He noted that his recommendations are not related to Benedict XVI’s document on the use of the 1962 Roman Missal.

“‘Nova et vetera,’” he urged, “the treasure of tradition and of new things, but rooted in tradition.”

Monsignor Miserachs suggested that contact with tradition should "not be limited to the academic realm, or concerts or records." Instead, “it should become again the living song of the assembly that finds in it that which calms their deepest spiritual tensions, and which makes them feel that they are truly the people of God.”
I like this Monsignor. He read my mind. The first quote I put in bold about how liturgical music ignores the grammar and ABC’s of the Musical art says it perfectly. It seems churches are overflowing with someone strumming on a guitar (with the SAME strumming pattern, over and over again) with the same few chords, and using the same keys, tempos, meters, and chord progressions. There are 12 keys, two kinds of meters, as many tempos as you want, and plenty of chords outside of the keys to use- which everyone with a college degree in music should know how to use.

I also like “the treasure of tradition and of new things, but rooted in tradition”. I’ve heard a lot of good music by 20th century composers that are very fitting in a liturgical setting, but to the untrained ear (and often even to the trained ear) sound like they came out of the Renaissance. Music doesn’t have to be old to be good- although time is a great filter.

I’ve said before (maybe not here) how frustrating it is to hear lots and lots of great music from all the historical periods- in college, high school, community, and professional choir concerts- but rarely, if ever, in church. It is even worse when a church gives a choir concert with this kind of music but they have to revert back to Marty Haugen and the St. Louis Jesuits as their staple for Mass. As far as holiness of the composers and the musicians, there have been problems with that for years (the council of Trent even specifically mentioned the problem of misbehaving church musicians), but they wrote music that had a high standard that I just don’t see in today’s music. Of course, I like hearing choir concerts- and I want to hear sacred music at them- that is a big part of music history. I want to hear sacred music in the venue it was written for as well, though- church.
 
Great interview!

This quote:
Monsignor Miserachs suggested that contact with tradition should “not be limited to the academic realm, or concerts or records.” Instead, “it should become again the living song of the assembly that finds in it that which calms their deepest spiritual tensions, and which makes them feel that they are truly the people of God.”
Reminds me of a comment a liturgist made after the reforms of Vatican II. Regarding the abandonment of high quality sacred music (which the liturgist did not seem to see as a problem at all) he said that Catholics could get exposed to sacred music in special concerts.

Good grief! And we don’t think there’s any good reason for capital punishment. 😉
 
I personally would welcome this. I am dismayed by the music that we get at mass in our new parish. Songs that are being marketed on the Now That’s Worship CD’s do not belong in a Catholic Mass IMO. (And yes, the “performers” are playing electric guitars, and a full drum set is up! Plus, people feel the need to applaud after mass…) I would just be overjoyed if that would disappear and we were required to sing traditional hymns accompanied by the organ! Anything beyond that would be icing on the cake!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top