D
do_justly_love_mercy
Guest
We are all familiar with people who describe themselves as “spiritual but not religious”. Less familiar is the description “religious but not spiritual”.
I would describe myself as religious. I participate in the sacraments and liturgies of the Church. I say prayers. I read the Bible. I live, as far as I am able, according to the moral teachings of Jesus and his Church. I am interested in theology, especially the Church Fathers and the early ecumenical councils.
However, I have never had any sense of “the spiritual”. I’ve never seen the point of silence, contemplation, meditation, etc. I’ve tried reading the works of mystics, but I never get anything out of them. They always seem rather nebulous to me. I much prefer a cogent discussion of some question pertaining to doctrine, ethics, or Church history.
I’m not even saying that I consider this to be a problem. I just wonder how common it is. There are people who have no interest in religion, but say things like, “I am a very spiritual person”, “I believe that there’s something else/more”, etc. Conversely, I have never had any sense of the sublime or the noumenal or the ineffable. I don’t have that indefinable emotion that people apparently have when they feel some kind of connection with something beyond this world. I am more stimulated by the intellectual and practical aspects of the faith.
I wonder whether temperamentally I am more like a Jew or even a pagan. I was discussing this topic with a Jewish friend, who seemed to think that my attitude toward religion was entirely unremarkable. He said that as a Jew he is simply required to perform the prescribed rituals and obey the law.
I would describe myself as religious. I participate in the sacraments and liturgies of the Church. I say prayers. I read the Bible. I live, as far as I am able, according to the moral teachings of Jesus and his Church. I am interested in theology, especially the Church Fathers and the early ecumenical councils.
However, I have never had any sense of “the spiritual”. I’ve never seen the point of silence, contemplation, meditation, etc. I’ve tried reading the works of mystics, but I never get anything out of them. They always seem rather nebulous to me. I much prefer a cogent discussion of some question pertaining to doctrine, ethics, or Church history.
I’m not even saying that I consider this to be a problem. I just wonder how common it is. There are people who have no interest in religion, but say things like, “I am a very spiritual person”, “I believe that there’s something else/more”, etc. Conversely, I have never had any sense of the sublime or the noumenal or the ineffable. I don’t have that indefinable emotion that people apparently have when they feel some kind of connection with something beyond this world. I am more stimulated by the intellectual and practical aspects of the faith.
I wonder whether temperamentally I am more like a Jew or even a pagan. I was discussing this topic with a Jewish friend, who seemed to think that my attitude toward religion was entirely unremarkable. He said that as a Jew he is simply required to perform the prescribed rituals and obey the law.
Last edited: