C
commenter
Guest
In my diocese there are several parishes staffed by religious orders, I am using this term to include all kinds of communities of priests.
There are a few parishes that are apparently not only staffed by religious orders, but owned by them as well. For instance, a parish made a public announcement “We are closing”.
This is different from parishes merely entrusted to an order by a diocese. When the order pulled out, the diocese either puts a diocesan priest in, gets another order to cover it, or the diocese itself closes it.
How do these situations originate?
Are there other canonical distinctions between order operated parishes, and those that are merely staffed by an order?
Would an Owned and operated parish be exempted from diocesan assessments, for instance? My suspicion is that the “owned” parishes as order created missions, and no new ones are opening in the US.
There are a few parishes that are apparently not only staffed by religious orders, but owned by them as well. For instance, a parish made a public announcement “We are closing”.
This is different from parishes merely entrusted to an order by a diocese. When the order pulled out, the diocese either puts a diocesan priest in, gets another order to cover it, or the diocese itself closes it.
How do these situations originate?
Are there other canonical distinctions between order operated parishes, and those that are merely staffed by an order?
Would an Owned and operated parish be exempted from diocesan assessments, for instance? My suspicion is that the “owned” parishes as order created missions, and no new ones are opening in the US.
Last edited: