S
StarMapp
Guest
I make reference to St. Margaret Mary’s story of Jesus responding “I don’t remember” when, for the purpose of discernment, she asked him what her last mortal sin was.
Moving on, our case subject Harry also confessed a mortal sin that was a civil crime and he asked Jesus the same, and he discovered it was also not remembered. Has a new man, he decides to do work in his church and the church does a screening criminal record check on him prior to taking him on. Although the debt is paid on the civil level, this mortal sin/crime is recorded and he is turned down.
Should the Church also refresh Jesus’s memory? It probably does automatically as the whole screening event along with reactions and findings are also recorded in the list of acts reserved for the last judgment. One fact to remember is, the civil justice system is also representative of God on earth.
If he commits no mortal sin when he confesses again and Jesus makes a second appearance to him, and he for the purpose of discernment asks the same question, is that same sin now remembered?
Thoughts?
Moving on, our case subject Harry also confessed a mortal sin that was a civil crime and he asked Jesus the same, and he discovered it was also not remembered. Has a new man, he decides to do work in his church and the church does a screening criminal record check on him prior to taking him on. Although the debt is paid on the civil level, this mortal sin/crime is recorded and he is turned down.
Should the Church also refresh Jesus’s memory? It probably does automatically as the whole screening event along with reactions and findings are also recorded in the list of acts reserved for the last judgment. One fact to remember is, the civil justice system is also representative of God on earth.
If he commits no mortal sin when he confesses again and Jesus makes a second appearance to him, and he for the purpose of discernment asks the same question, is that same sin now remembered?
Thoughts?