Revelations

  • Thread starter Thread starter w_stewart
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

w_stewart

Guest
Do the Eastern/Oriental Catholics accept the apparitions of Mary in Fatima, Lourdes, etc? Do they believe these as authentic?

How about the testimony of St. Faustina pertaining to the existence of hell and purgatory?
 
You can find Eastern Catholics who believe in or have devotion to each of these; just as many who have no particular devotion to, attraction toward, interest in, or belief in any of those referenced; and others who reject outright some or all of them.

Many years,

Neil
 
You can find Eastern Catholics who believe in or have devotion to each of these; just as many who have no particular devotion to, attraction toward, interest in, or belief in any of those referenced; and others who reject outright some or all of them.

Many years,

Neil
So there is no single Eastern/Oriental Catholic Church which has official stand on these revelations?
 
<So there is no single Eastern/Oriental Catholic Church which has official stand on these revelations?>>

Not really.

Keep in mind that according to the Holy Gospels, the last words of the Virgin recorded there are: “Whatever He says to you, do it.”

Why need she say anything more?
 
<So there is no single Eastern/Oriental Catholic Church which has official stand on these revelations?>>

Not really.

Keep in mind that according to the Holy Gospels, the last words of the Virgin recorded there are: “Whatever He says to you, do it.”

Why need she say anything more?
What is your point?
 
What is your point?
That there is no point according to the east for Mary to appear to people. It means nothing to eastern Catholicism. She has said everything when she said “do what He tells you”.
 
Jimmy, this may be true in your particular tradition, but it cannot be said of the East in general. The apparition at Βλαχερναί, for example, is on the calendar of many Slavic churches, and is commemorated in the patronal dedication of very many parishes. A far cry from “means nothing”.
 
Jimmy, this may be true in your particular tradition, but it cannot be said of the East in general. The apparition at Βλαχερναί, for example, is on the calendar of many Slavic churches, and is commemorated in the patronal dedication of very many parishes. A far cry from “means nothing”.
But on this occasion, she was not alone, but surrounded by choirs of different saints, as the icon depicts–and said nothing.
 
So there is no single Eastern/Oriental Catholic Church which has official stand on these revelations?
The stand is that of Rome - they are approved private revelations…

But even private revelations are just that - private revelations… but part of the public deposit of faith, but pious reveleations that the faithful MAY accept.

I believe in Fatima very much. OL Lourdes has also been widely popular among many Greek Catholics.

But please keep in mind, even Latins are not obligated to have these devotions or accept these revelations.
 
That there is no point according to the east for Mary to appear to people. It means nothing to eastern Catholicism. She has said everything when she said “do what He tells you”.
Jimmy I think you are taking on a distinctive contradistinctive approach to Eastern Catholocism. Very to-may-to/to-mah-to.

Marian apparitions and miraculous icons loom large in Eastern Christianity. To “It means nothing to eastern Catholicism.” is a gross and inaccurate mischaracterization and over generalization.
 
Jimmy I think you are taking on a distinctive contradistinctive approach to Eastern Catholocism. Very to-may-to/to-mah-to.

Marian apparitions and miraculous icons loom large in Eastern Christianity. To "It means nothing to eastern Catholicism." is a gross and inaccurate mischaracterization and over generalization.
Icons are different than Mary coming and revealing three secrets to a few children as done in Fatima. I might have been a little strong in my characterization but I wasn’t ever really giving my opinion. I was simply explaining what bpbasil said.

My view on appearances like Fatima and Lourdes is that they mean very little to me. It will not change my faith. There is all this debate about whether the consecration of Russia has been fulfilled. It is all meaningless to me. Fatima has been a source of division for the western church.
 
Fatima has been a source of division for the western church.
And a source of unity and fervant spirituality as well.

The division I mostly relegate to some grunerites and those opposing them. That it is more widespread or eclipses the greater benifit of Fatima - wider devotion to the rosary, devotions, confession - is hardly the case.

A good deal of our co-religionists in the Greek Catholic church found solice, personal peace, comfort and consolation in Fatima during the darkets years of our church’s suppression in the Soviet Empire.

The rosary was prayed fervantly by many during those years (and many still today) for deliverance from persecution. I believe with all my heart that those prayers to the Mother of God were efficacious and did not just float off unheard into the ether like so much cigarette smoke…

I don’t agree at all with those that have enshrined Fatima as a battleground for Roman orthodoxy. But on balance, such debates and those polemicists are in the minority - the fruits of that devotion have far outweighed the effects of a bitter debate among the few.
 
And a source of unity and fervant spirituality as well.

The division I mostly relegate to some grunerites and those opposing them. That it is more widespread or eclipses the greater benifit of Fatima - wider devotion to the rosary, devotions, confession - is hardly the case.

A good deal of our co-religionists in the Greek Catholic church found solice, personal peace, comfort and consolation in Fatima during the darkets years of our church’s suppression in the Soviet Empire.

The rosary was prayed fervantly by many during those years (and many still today) for deliverance from persecution. I believe with all my heart that those prayers to the Mother of God were efficacious and did not just float off unheard into the ether like so much cigarette smoke…

I don’t agree at all with those that have enshrined Fatima as a battleground for Roman orthodoxy. But on balance, such debates and those polemicists are in the minority - the fruits of that devotion have far outweighed the effects of a bitter debate among the few.
That is good. I am fine with people finding solice in the apparitions. In that way they have been a good thing. I myself do not find them meaningful for myself.
 
That there is no point according to the east for Mary to appear to people. It means nothing to eastern Catholicism. She has said everything when she said “do what He tells you”.
God bless!

I think no real russian orthodox would agree ! The Allholy Theotokos appears unceasingly in russia and other orthodox countries !
In greece/ Mount Athos she also often appeared in out times, Eldress Myrtidiotissa saw her daily or Schema Monk Parthenij of Kiew say her also for hours a day and talked with her and with many other Saints!

Or in Georgia in the capitol city- Tiblissi ! Where thousends of orthodox christians saw her !

You have to be very careful - in the orthodox church - such appearances are honored in the highest way- or do u not now the Synaxarion wich is full of such occasions ?

So the last words were not the words of Kaana.

But we shoud proof the appearances if they are from God or from Delusion ! But we never denied that the Allholy Theotokos or other Saints do appear !

The question is not if She is appearing ( of course She is) - and if appearances have a great point in orthodoxy ( it is clear they have) but if the appearances are true or not .

I met people who say that they have Visions and so on, but for it me it is clear that they are under Delusion but I also met people who have true visions and appearances !

In CHRIST
 
I have in my possession an Akathist written by a Byzantine Catholic (at another forum) in honor of Our Lady of Guadalupe. So Eastern Catholics certainly may believe in these apparitions if they wish (though like all Catholics, they’re not required to).
 
I have in my possession an Akathist written by a Byzantine Catholic (at another forum) in honor of Our Lady of Guadalupe. So Eastern Catholics certainly may believe in these apparitions if they wish (though like all Catholics, they’re not required to).
Akathist or moleban?

Either way, if you have a digi version of that, I would love to see it.
 
Akathist or moleban?

Either way, if you have a digi version of that, I would love to see it.
Actually I am searching the message board where it was originally posted - here’s the link to a thread which mentions it, and I will come back & edit this reply when I find the Akathist itself:

byzcath.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/160717/fpart/1

(Update - unfortunately Orthodox Catholic’s Akathist seems to be MIA! If I can locate it I’ll post again here - sorry!)
 
Alex’s Akathist is also on the old Unicorne site, as I recollect. My sister, wannabe may remember.

Many years,

Neil
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top