Robert Young?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lorarose
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Lorarose

Guest
It seems sola scriptura is not my only stumbling block with a particular protestant.
He often refers to “Young’s Analytical Concordance” during debate and insists that this source gives the proper “meaning” of original hebrew and greek.
I’ve never heard of Robert Young, and don’t know if his knowledge of hebrew and greek is any good or not.
 
40.png
Lorarose:
It seems sola scriptura is not my only stumbling block with a particular protestant.
He often refers to “Young’s Analytical Concordance” during debate and insists that this source gives the proper “meaning” of original hebrew and greek.
I’ve never heard of Robert Young, and don’t know if his knowledge of hebrew and greek is any good or not.
You forgot Aramaic, since a significant portion of the bible was written in Aramaic.
 
40.png
Lorarose:
It seems sola scriptura is not my only stumbling block with a particular protestant.
He often refers to “Young’s Analytical Concordance” during debate and insists that this source gives the proper “meaning” of original hebrew and greek.
I’ve never heard of Robert Young, and don’t know if his knowledge of hebrew and greek is any good or not.
The problem with arguments about Hebrew and Greek is that anyone can refer to it and make it mean anything they want, and if you don’t know it yourself, you’re stuck. As far as Young’s Concordance goes, in evangelical circles it’s a respected resource.
 
ok - that makes sense.
supposedly Young has referred to “sabaath” as not necessarily being a saturday - but being any day of rest.

This person is saying the jew had an “annual sabbath” that is separate from the weekly sabaath, and it doesn’t always fall on a saturday.

Does this make sense? I’ve never heard anyone argue this before (it goes back to the issue of Jesus supposedly not being crucified on a friday)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top