Romans 14

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrankF
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

FrankF

Guest
I’ve been having a discussion with my friend about Romans 14, where Paul addresses deitary regulations.

I think she’s taken a few of these verses and applied them in a much broader sense than was actually intended, but I’m wondering how to convince her against this.

For example, she’s using v. 19:

“Let us then pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding.”

and v. 22:

“The faith that you have, keep between yourself and God; happy is he who has no reason to judge himself for what he approves.”

as means to suggest that doctrinal differences (i.e. between denominations - baptism, prayer to saints, etc.) are acceptable as long as they are believed “in faith.”

To an extent, I agree (but not on many of the issues she’s extending the argument to include.) I believe the word “faith” in v. 22 speaks more to “opinion,” because as we see in Paul’s other letters, he is very concerned with doctrinal unity. I’ve used Galatians 1:6-10 as an example. (Any other passages relating to such an issue would be appreciated.)

I’m just wondering if anyone can suggest some modern day “opinions” where fellow Christians should avoid in-fighting for the sake of unity. I think the idea of predestination in terms of thomism vs. molinism may be such an example.

Thanks!

-Ed
 
Hi Ed,
This is a typical case of using scripture out of context. The whole of chapter 14 is how to deal with scrupulous people who think they have to abstain from certain foods. St. Paul’s advice is not to disturb or intimidate them with your better knowledge and better developped faith.

The two passages you quote are to be read within that context. They have nothing to do with people of other faiths.

Verbum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top