That is fine that you “feel” that way but the sacrament of Baptism is not about feelings. The agreements and professions of faith are real and binding to God. In this case the co-habitating parents would agree to raise the child in the faith while obstinantly rejecting one of it’s basic truths. How is that possible? Do you want them to lie to God during the sacrament?
So you don’t “feel” that the baby deserves the grace of Baptism? That child did something to not deserve having their original sin cleansed away? I don’t get your logic. Baptism is for the baby. Not the parents. If they messed up their own lives, that is not the baby’s fault. What if this child should die before they are old enough to choose to have themselves baptized? Wouldn’t that be worse than allowing it to be Baptized?
We’ve taken this approach for the past 30+ years and now we are talking about lower mass attendence and less vocations all over the country. It isn’t working. The sacraments are not rights nor are they handouts.
We have a lot bigger problems in the Church than Baptizing babies who are born out of wedlock. Besides, the young people who are living a sinful lifestyle today were probably never educated properly to begin with. So now we are going to punish them and their children? Way to bring people back to the Truth!
I would let them attend the classes - just not the sacrament until their public sin is resolved. Believe me, I would not just close the door. I would clearly indicate that they need to resolve this situation of living together or else they are putting their soul and their new child’s soul in danger. I would give them every opportunity to resolve the sin. In fact, this IS the opportunity to do it.
Well, that is a little more encouraging. And I would agee on this in the case of Communion, or even Marriage. Of course, they would have to be made aware of Church teaching on these issues which does not happen alot these days. But Baptism is mainly for the child, not the parents. May I quote the CCC from 1216. It is a quote from St. Gregory of Nanzianzus.:
“Baptism is God’s most beautiful and magnificent gift…We call it gift, grace, anointing, enlightenment, garment of immortality, bath of rebirth, seal, and most precious gift. It is called
gift because it is conferred on those who bring nothing of their own;
grace since it is given even to the guilty;
Baptism because sin is buried in the water; …
clothing since it veils our shame;
bath because it washes…”
Different situation. Single parent is not co-habitating. No problem with baptizing the child under those circumstances. The problem with baptizing while co-habitating is it brings scandal to the sacraments. It cheapens the perception what the sacraments are in reality. Thus, so many IN the Church think they are being faithful because they receive the Eucharist and have Baptism parties and Holy Communion parties but they are not really being faithful. It is an illusion. It is dangerous. It is effecting souls for all eternity - souls that filled the pews
.
I was co-habitating when she was conceived. Anyway, while you have good points, I just don’t think that they apply to Baptism because that is witholding grace from the innocent baby. You are denying them entrance to life in Christ, and I think that is the greater scandal.