K
kaizen
Guest
I have visited at least two websites in the internet saying that Saint Peter’s tomb was discovered somewhere in Jerusalem. The urls are the following:
biblelight.net/peters-jerusalem-tomb.htm
biblebelievers.org.au/nl373.htm
According to these sites, the tomb of Saint Peter in Rome is a hoax, that the discovery of Peter’s tomb in Jerusalem was being covered up by the Vatican, that several priests in Jerusalem authenticated the discovery…
They even accused Saint Jerome of deliberately altering the works of Eusebius, that “he added a fantastic story of Peter’s residence in Rome”. Based on the discovery, they concluded that Peter was never the first bishop of Rome, and consequently, the popes were not really the successors of Peter…
I hope somebody will help me regarding this. I’m really, really, confused at this matter…
biblelight.net/peters-jerusalem-tomb.htm
biblebelievers.org.au/nl373.htm
According to these sites, the tomb of Saint Peter in Rome is a hoax, that the discovery of Peter’s tomb in Jerusalem was being covered up by the Vatican, that several priests in Jerusalem authenticated the discovery…
They even accused Saint Jerome of deliberately altering the works of Eusebius, that “he added a fantastic story of Peter’s residence in Rome”. Based on the discovery, they concluded that Peter was never the first bishop of Rome, and consequently, the popes were not really the successors of Peter…
I hope somebody will help me regarding this. I’m really, really, confused at this matter…