L
liber8ed217
Guest
What is it people? Can you be assured of your salvation or do you have to live a worthy life to earn it… SCRIPTURES to back up your posts
Take the talons off would you?What kind of request is that, use some mannersWhat is it people? Can you be assured of your salvation or do you have to live a worthy life to earn it… SCRIPTURES to back up your posts
Okay, I do believe you are right to a point, but look at what God says: He knows everything about us and who is going to trust in Jesus and who isn’t. Pslam 139 is the best place to start and then we can go to the New Testament and see how Jesus elaborated on that as well as the apostle James.As a practical matter, discussions about salvation are highly overrated.
What difference does it make? He who loves Jesus follows His commands. What more can you do? Let faith take it from there. Only the faithless worry and fret about such things; tomorrow has enough worries of its own.
Alan
References:
John 14:21: Whoever has my commandments and observes them is the one who loves me. And whoever loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and reveal myself to him."
Matt 6:34: Do not worry about tomorrow; tomorrow will take care of itself. Sufficient for a day is its own evil.
Okay Heartbroke,
So you’re tellin’ me that I can go out and live any old way that I want and just show up for church at your church every Sunday and Wednesday and my Salvation is secured because I said a prayer and accepted Jesus as my personal Lord and savior…right?
(!st Cor 9:27). hmmm…St. Paul was not “secure” in his salvation, now was he?
Pax Vobiscum.
No one has said that. I don’t believe we can live however we want. That is not what the Scriptures teach either. You obviously only believe what you are told.
1 Corinthians 9:24-10:14 Know you not that they who run in a race all run, but one receives the prize? So run, that you may obtain. And every man that strives for self control is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible. I therefore so run, not with uncertainty; so fight I, not as one that beats the air: But I roughly treat my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be disqualified. Moreover, brethren, I want not that you should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual food; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ. But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. Neither be you idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. Neither let us test Christ, as some of them also tested him, and were destroyed by serpents. Neither murmur you, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed by the destroyer. Now all these things happened unto them for examples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages are come. Therefore let him that thinks he stands take heed lest he fall. There has no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not allow you to be tempted above that you are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that you may be able to bear it. Therefore, my dearly beloved, flee from idolatry.
I do find it very hard to understand why you would believe that those who really believe the Word of God are liars??? It never ceases to amaze me, expecially when it is His Word that has caused me to be the most moral person in my family and work environment. ( I work with a couple of Roman Catholics in my job, and one is so critical of everything and everyone, and the other is so dishonest it would make you puke)
One customer phoned in and complained about me, but when they lied (a catholic) my bossed dismissed the whole thing, because they know I do not lie and live my faith)James 2:18 Yea, a man may say, You have faith, and I have works: show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
I think first of all you need to learn to take Scripture in context. You cannot take a portion of a verse or a section and leave the others hanging; take the whole passage, it might be only a few verses but it could be a couple of chapters to get the whole context of the teaching. Please pay attention to that before you start quoting God’s Word. That is probably the biggest reason Peter said that some of Paul’s teachings were hard to understand.
Did you ever notice how many people were amazed at Jesus teaching? He didn’t rely on prior rabbi’s teachings or commentaries, He said it like it was meant to be. Amen!
Hello Liber8,What is it people? Can you be assured of your salvation or do you have to live a worthy life to earn it… SCRIPTURES to back up your posts
Heartbroke,(I work with a couple of Roman Catholics in my job, and one is so critical of everything and everyone, and the other is so dishonest it would make you puke)
Heartbroke,
It is not the Catholic Church’s fault that these Roman Catholics are critical and dishonest. The CC teaches everyone, repeat everyone (even non-catholics) that they should not be critical and dishonest. So when a Catholic is critical and dishonest, he is doing so under his own authority which is in rebellion to the authority of the Church. Neither Jesus, nor St. Peter, nor any of his successor popes have taught that it is ok to be critical of others and dishonest.
When someone does this he objectively sins as he is being disobedient and in rebellion to the Church founded by Christ and which calls everyone to holiness in doing God’s will. When I am dishonest it is my fault, not the Pope’s or Church’s fault. When I do good it is because the Church teaches me that I should do good, therefore credit redounds to the Church.
If everyone would obey the Pope then we would have paradise on earth as his teachings are guided by the Holy Spirit and are true. There would be no criticism of others, no dishonesty, no lying, stealing, murder, adultery, artificial birth control, abortion, anger, blashpemy etc. All of the prisons would close as there would be no lawbreakers (assuming all the laws are just) and we could throw away all of our keys.
Joe
Final answers:I do find it very hard to understand why you would believe that those who really believe the Word of God are liars??? It never ceases to amaze me, expecially when it is His Word that has caused me to be the most moral person in my family and work environment. ( I work with a couple of Roman Catholics in my job, and one is so critical of everything and everyone, and the other is so dishonest it would make you puke)
One customer phoned in and complained about me, but when they lied (a catholic) my bossed dismissed the whole thing, because they know I do not lie and live my faith)James 2:18 Yea, a man may say, You have faith, and I have works: show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
I think first of all you need to learn to take Scripture in context. You cannot take a portion of a verse or a section and leave the others hanging; take the whole passage, it might be only a few verses but it could be a couple of chapters to get the whole context of the teaching. Please pay attention to that before you start quoting God’s Word. That is probably the biggest reason Peter said that some of Paul’s teachings were hard to understand.
Did you ever notice how many people were amazed at Jesus teaching? He didn’t rely on prior rabbi’s teachings or commentaries, He said it like it was meant to be. Amen!
I agree - myself includedIt really is quite simple.
Catholic: Salvation is a gift offered by God to all, but not forced upon anyone. God intends us to be santicifed with the end result being that in heaven, we will be perfected and able to live in the presence of God like He intended all along (before the sin of Adam and Eve). But because God has granted us this free will, sanctification requires CONTINUED acceptance of Grace in our lives and in our ACTIONS, not just a one-time conversion experience. Acceptance of Grace requires submission, obedience, charity and sacrifice. These actions do not PRODUCE or EARN the Grace, they are merely the means God has chosen for us to accept His grace.
Luther: All men are heaps of dung. Salvation comes through faith alone. Through faith, the saved are like heaps of dung covered with pure and perfect snow. The man is unchanged, he is only COVERED by God’s grace. Therefore, his actions are irrelevent.
Trouble is that Luther’s approach CANNOT be supported by Jesus’ teaching on the Sheep and Goats, or Paul’s ‘fear and trembling’ passage or the others mentioned above. The CATHOLIC teaching is consistant with ALL Bible passages on salvation. Luther’s is NOT.
Notice that NEITHER precept contends that salvation is earned.
If it makes you feel better, I think everybody here will freely concede that an awful lot of catholics on the street are not well educated on the distinction outlined above.
Consequences for Apologetics
The Joint Declaration has great ecumenical significance, but it is a watershed as well in the history of Catholic-Protestant apologetics.
It will be unnecessary now for Catholic apologists to maintain a confrontational stance on this topic when the Church is taking a different tack. This is especially true concerning the seven topics from section 4 of the Joint Declaration, including the touchy subject of the “faith alone” formula. Catholics who insist on being confrontational on these issues will increasingly find themselves facing the rejoinder, “How can you say that when your own Church says something different?”
God Bless,Consequently, it is better for the apologist to be conciliatory on justification. This will have a number of positive effects. It will keep our language in conformity with the language of the Church. It will force us to learn the Church’s theology of justification in greater depth, rather than simply repeating stock formulas. And, most importantly, it will make our message more appealing to Protestants who might be interested in converting.
Thank you for the advice. I agree with your example and will probably use it when the argument merits it. I thought you came on a little strong, but your assessment of the original poster certainly sounds accurate - “What is it people?” doesn’t sound charitable.rlg,
Rebuke accepted. In general. However, in a situation where an attack is clearly made, it may be useful (perhaps even pastoral) to surprise the attacker with a rather more vigorous defense than he expected.
Just as a tragic number of catholics fail to understand the difference between ‘merit’ and '‘earn’ in catholic theology of salvation, there are a fair number of evangelicals who have not realized that what they truly believe inside is harmful to their own sanctification. I have had quite an immersion in the evangelical culture at times in my life and I can tell you first-hand that the “covered sin” view of salvation is alive and well in American Evangelicals, even if their senior theologans have grown beyond it. The bluntness of my example, has repeatedly earned me grudging respect from earnest evangelicals. I judged a low-post # author’s thread consisting of a one sentence attack to be worthy of such attention getting devices.
Just as an Evangelical is right to confront a catholic who thinks ‘being good’ earns him a place in heaven, a catholic is right to confront a protestant who believes his actions are totally irrelevent to his relationship to God.
Peace.