F
FuzzyBunny116
Guest
Well first off, let me say that this argument might not be fully complete. I accidently hit the back button right near the end of this treaste and it erased my whole post .
I’ve read a few books and talked to a few people about who will be saved. It is my personal belief that as long as one leads a relativly good life, no matter their religion, they will merit Heaven. I seem to be being told that only those, for the most part, who are Catholic or Christian (I’ve heard it both ways) and are good people will be saved.
This doesn’t seem right to me for a number of reasons.
If a man is born into, say, a Muslim household, logically, MOST of the time, he will grow up Muslim. If a man is born into a Catholic household, logically, MOST of the time, he will grow up Muslim. Both of these religions seem to me to say that they are the only ones that will bring salvation. If Catholism (sp) brings salvation, is it the Muslim’s fault that he was brought up Muslim? Afterall, it seems hard to convince him that Catholism is the ‘right’ religion. If Islam brings salvation, is it the Catholic’s fault that he was born into Catholism? Both pull you towards them, saying they are the only way it seems, so how is one supposed to choose?
As well, it is said “nothing unclean shall enter heaven,” so wouldn’t one argue that nothing clean shall enter heaven? I know everyone sins, but those who sin little, and do many good works, even if they aren’t Catholic, don’t seem to deserve Hell to me. It’s silly as well it seems to say that those before Jesus will be doomed since they weren’t Catholics. “Well, they didn’t have a chance to be Catholics,” one might say. So wouldn’t they have an advantage over us? They never had anyone to say “This religion is the only way.” If a secluded tribe in some foreign jungle somewhere has never heard of Jesus, will he be saved if he was a good person? If yes, then wouldn’t it be a disadvantage to those who HAVE heard of Jesus, as now they HAVE to believe them in order to be saved? If no, is it their fault that they were born into a land that had never heard of him?
I really wish I could remember the rest of my argument, but I’m going to close this up until I can remember the rest.
All my life I’ve heard “Its’ the thought that counts,” “All that matters is you tried your best,” etc. If people tried their best, but were lead astray by religions that THOUGHT they were doing the right thing (I’ve heard of Catholism around the time of the Reformatoin, and I would have probably joined them with how messed up the Church was) and trying to lead people the right way, do they deserve Hell?
If anyone could answer me with their (name removed by moderator)ut, I would grately appreciate it. I’m starting to see all these little things that seem to want to hint “the end is nigh” and all, and I worry much for my non-Catholic/Christian friends.
Help!
I’ve read a few books and talked to a few people about who will be saved. It is my personal belief that as long as one leads a relativly good life, no matter their religion, they will merit Heaven. I seem to be being told that only those, for the most part, who are Catholic or Christian (I’ve heard it both ways) and are good people will be saved.
This doesn’t seem right to me for a number of reasons.
If a man is born into, say, a Muslim household, logically, MOST of the time, he will grow up Muslim. If a man is born into a Catholic household, logically, MOST of the time, he will grow up Muslim. Both of these religions seem to me to say that they are the only ones that will bring salvation. If Catholism (sp) brings salvation, is it the Muslim’s fault that he was brought up Muslim? Afterall, it seems hard to convince him that Catholism is the ‘right’ religion. If Islam brings salvation, is it the Catholic’s fault that he was born into Catholism? Both pull you towards them, saying they are the only way it seems, so how is one supposed to choose?
As well, it is said “nothing unclean shall enter heaven,” so wouldn’t one argue that nothing clean shall enter heaven? I know everyone sins, but those who sin little, and do many good works, even if they aren’t Catholic, don’t seem to deserve Hell to me. It’s silly as well it seems to say that those before Jesus will be doomed since they weren’t Catholics. “Well, they didn’t have a chance to be Catholics,” one might say. So wouldn’t they have an advantage over us? They never had anyone to say “This religion is the only way.” If a secluded tribe in some foreign jungle somewhere has never heard of Jesus, will he be saved if he was a good person? If yes, then wouldn’t it be a disadvantage to those who HAVE heard of Jesus, as now they HAVE to believe them in order to be saved? If no, is it their fault that they were born into a land that had never heard of him?
I really wish I could remember the rest of my argument, but I’m going to close this up until I can remember the rest.
All my life I’ve heard “Its’ the thought that counts,” “All that matters is you tried your best,” etc. If people tried their best, but were lead astray by religions that THOUGHT they were doing the right thing (I’ve heard of Catholism around the time of the Reformatoin, and I would have probably joined them with how messed up the Church was) and trying to lead people the right way, do they deserve Hell?
If anyone could answer me with their (name removed by moderator)ut, I would grately appreciate it. I’m starting to see all these little things that seem to want to hint “the end is nigh” and all, and I worry much for my non-Catholic/Christian friends.
Help!