I do not understand this line of reasoning. Do not do solve part of the problem because it will not solve the entire problem? This is clearly making the perfect the enemy of the good. Am I missing something?Why are we even bothering with this? Most people here illegally simply enter legally and never leave.
While overstays are significant, they are not the largest group.Why are we even bothering with this? Most people here illegally simply enter legally and never leave. Read up on previous attempts to build a more limited wall in the mid 2000’s. The land right issues and quirks of the boarder, especially with respect to the Rio Grande, make things way more complicated than a campaign slogan. Also mind you this is Breitbart.
It seems like we’ve already discussed this inaccurate claim.While overstays are significant, they are not the largest group.
Personally I see even the overstays are lessening. We have workers with seasonal visas. This year they scheduled a visit but an early snowstorm put off some outdoor work. By the time the snow melted, they had already returned, though I wish they could have asked for an extension.We do need a better grip on overstays, especially if they are a significant cost to taxpayers.
Student and exchange visa holders are more likely to overstay than any of their peers, although a large proportion of that rate is attributable to students who do leave eventually. Unsurprisingly, fewer than one percent of arrivals from Visa Waiver Program countries overstay, indicating that the program is relatively successful.
By contrast, about two percent of B1/B2 visa holders overstay their visas, and about two percent of the “other” category. It is unclear what proportion of the other category’s overstays is attributable to temporary workers, although the other groups included therein are more likely to either leave with their diplomatic charge or to change their status to a permanent family preference visa.