Secular media confusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter friardchips
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

friardchips

Guest
mail.com/int/news/europe/3866618-pope-urges-prejudices-start-family-synod.html#.1272-stage-hero1-4

The above is an example of the secular media, through misunderstanding, pushing politics into the Church i.e:- if one abides by the doctrines, the truths, of the Church then one is labelled a conservative as opposed to a progressive, or this, or that:

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO.

If one abides by the doctrines of the Church and accepts faith in all its fullness then one is simply a Catholic, and a Christian! The difference of opinion when concerning doctrine is not argued between conservatives or liberals or any of those political junkie titles, but rather, the difference is between those who can see the truth and those who can’t: truth and lesser truths, or falsity, morals and immorality, good and evil - truth is only relative according to who adheres to eternal truths (doctrines) or not. Doctrines cannot be wrong but can be developed and applied. So it is not a matter of who in the Church is a “conservative” or a “progressive” or this, or that. But simply who is a Catholic! The Church is not Parliament or Congress, and it is not a media Circus either. This highlights the massive amount of work to be done in education amongst secular society.
 
The movers and shakers of the world are to a large degree uncatechised Catholics. God is showing up what we could have done for the world and didn’t. Why has catechising Catholics been such a dirty word for the last 60 years? (Including those who aren’t movers or shakers for that matter.)
 
The movers and shakers of the world are to a large degree uncatechised Catholics. God is showing up what we could have done for the world and didn’t. Why has catechising Catholics been such a dirty word for the last 60 years? (Including those who aren’t movers or shakers for that matter.)
Good points! 👍 Maybe because Catholic teaching was thought of as something dry compared to the technological era and sexual revolution, and as a consequence, the word ‘dirty’ was twisted and subversion became an eventuality - ‘freedom’ took on a different meaning in which more superficial means to happiness were served up in the world - with one result (or lack of result) being that less people took the RCC less seriously, and maybe some of this pressure meant a decrease of inertia in catechesis within the Church.
 
…typo: more (not less) people, took the RCC seriously.
 
… being that less * people took the RCC less seriously, and maybe some of this pressure meant a decrease of inertia in catechesis within the Church.*

Probably the other way round as well. 😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top