A
AServantofGod
Guest
Just that - what is it?
How’s that for discussing the topic without discussing the topic?For the foreseeable future, the moderation staff, in conjunction with the apologetics staff, has decided to ban the topic of sedevacantism (i.e., the theory that there can be at points in Church history no current valid pope). Any threads that open with the topic of sedevacantism will be deleted; any that drift into that topic will be locked.
Technically, Sedevaticanism would be belief in the “Chair of the Vatican”…I guess all Catholics would be considered Sedevaticanists!Sedevaticanism is not a banned topic; sedevacantism is, however.
Haha…I guess that any Christian who is not Catholic is sedevaticanist. So, what do you want to know about sedevaticanism? :yup:
Originally Posted by Dr. Collosus:
Haha…good point. I don’t know Latin very well. For some reason I thought that “sede” meant “without.” (Just found out that “sine” means “without” in Latin.)Technically, Sedevaticanism would be belief in the “Chair of the Vatican”…I guess all Catholics would be considered Sedevaticanists
PLEASE…don’t ask and get that started againJust that - what is it?