This is a topic close to my heart. Ever since I began to think about God, the universe, and faith it has made more ontological sense to me to view things through the eyes of a greater unity. For example, did God create the universe from nothing? Don’t we have to acknowledge that it is at least created out of God’s will, desire and probabaly energy? Then there is the aspect of God’s omnipresence and that God somehow sustains all creation. God is immanent as well as transcendent. How can that be? Unlessall creation is a manifestation of God and all things are small, relatively independent expressions of God. None the totality, but all small unique expressions.
So I have spent most of my life trying to reconcile this feeling or awareness or strong sense of the greater unity with the strongly dualistic, us here-God there, infinitely out there view of theology.
Are you a heart? No, but you have a heart. It is part of you. Same for your brain and same for your ego. It is part of you but not your totality. Same for the many thoughts and feelings that come and go. They are part of you, expressions of you and in some abstract sense …you. But then again , not.
And we each are expressions of God, interconnected, bonded together by God;s desire for our existence. But none of us are Godhead. Our divinity is correlated to our awareness of our unity. The more we see ourselves ONLY as separate, independent beings the less we know our deeper reality as the body of Christ.
So Richard Rohr calls this An Alternate Orthodoxy. Sorry, i don’t think the Roman Catholic Church has ever held it. It was always too quick and too fearful and needed to define heresy, Monism, Pantheism, etc.
But how do we read the unity Jesus speaks of in John’s Gospel?