I
InSearchofGrace
Guest
The audit process, from what I deduce from selected documents on the USCCB site, started in 2002 and is ongoing. Too little, too late, as critics would say. True, the CC should have moved decisively much sooner, but too little it is not. The audit is ambitious and not a small undertaking. 195 dioceses and eparchies (requiring on-site study) which oversee an estimated 20,000 parishes.Is this the ongoing audit and the current background checks for all levels from volunteers to employees to priests?
…
Of importance, the bishops set up a Charter to Protect Children and Young People with which all dioceses have to comply. This link provides the latest (2009) Annual Charter Report. . There is also a BishopAccountability.org which is an evidence archive of all past and present abuse claims.
The sweep included creation of the National Review Board and commissioning the John Jay College to obtain history and context of CC clergy abuse from 1950 to 2002. The JJ Report is not finished, but it brought in enough information to collaborate / confirm findings by 2004, completion in Dec 2010.
The background checks, as I understand it, covers all, religious, employees, educators (in parish schools) and volunteers. See this link. Evaluation of everyone who comes in contact with children is performed. It is integrated under the risk management program in force in all parishes, called Virtus.
I am not a CC employee, just a Catholic interested in how the Church as an organization is handling the scandal of clergy abuse, the biggest challenge in its history. As her detractors keep saying, the Church has a reputation of being secretive. That’s in the past, as I found out and as you will agree. Anyone, Catholic or non-Catholic (like you) can now look up a very transparent online information site.
According to this, the USCCB is a corporation, albeit with a mission statement not like all other businesses. There is probably a parallel to the board of directors, but I can’t tell you more without digging further.…
Not to overly secularize things, but if you used a corporate analogy, if a board of directors discovered that corporate officers had allowed senior employees to commit extensive criminal acts spanning years, the board ought to dismiss the officers.
If you are alluding to dismissal of bishops (officers) because of acts of its senior employees (priests), I would think the information I provided in my previous post (to portarica) addresses this.
. . . . .