Y
yawnernonner
Guest
These baffle me because even though they are novel, they are greatly inane. I don’t know how they have any rhetorical force in this man’s mind. Please refute these.
1: Apostolic succession is not important to him because “His mercies are new every morning.”
2: Jesus’ words to the apostles in Mark 16 and elsewhere are for “all believers.” I told him, “Jesus only said ‘you,’” and he started laughing and said that there is “a whole host of Scripture that countermands that.” (Show any potential verses that support his point and refute such interpretations.)
3: “Man wasn’t meant to be under authority; who did Adam run to?” (Please provide
4: “Man started putting God in physical objects,” referring to sacramentals, “and neglecting their ‘spirit-men’” (He gets a lot from Kenneth Hagin).
1: Apostolic succession is not important to him because “His mercies are new every morning.”
2: Jesus’ words to the apostles in Mark 16 and elsewhere are for “all believers.” I told him, “Jesus only said ‘you,’” and he started laughing and said that there is “a whole host of Scripture that countermands that.” (Show any potential verses that support his point and refute such interpretations.)
3: “Man wasn’t meant to be under authority; who did Adam run to?” (Please provide
4: “Man started putting God in physical objects,” referring to sacramentals, “and neglecting their ‘spirit-men’” (He gets a lot from Kenneth Hagin).